The table describes the changes of people who went for international travel in 1990, 1995, 2000 and 2005. (million). Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The table presents the number of citizens from five different nations who already travelled to other countries between 1990 and 2005.
Overall
, it is noticeable that the rate of travellers from those communities roughly increased; Linking Words
whereas
, a lot of people in America preferred to stay at home based on their number, which actually went downhill Linking Words
at the end
of the period.
Linking Words
To begin
with, in 1990, there was a ballpark figure of about 448.9 million participants who went overseas and climbed significantly almost twofold in 2005. Linking Words
Hence
, it strongly proved that the majority of nations contributed to the achievement. Linking Words
Additionally
, Europe performed the best data and took the lead by 400.2 points; Linking Words
in contrast
, the number of travellers from America dropped dramatically over five times.
Linking Words
Furthermore
, Asian and Pacific people increased considerably during the event from 60.2 million in the initial year to 50% higher in 2005, which placed them were placed to the second position. Linking Words
Finally
, African and Middle West inhabitants Linking Words
also
grew moderately by 8.5 for fifteen years.Linking Words
Submitted by soniandriawan1992 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
Conclusion: The conclusion is too long.
Vocabulary: The word "number of" was used 2 times.
▼
Vocabulary: The word "increased" was used 2 times.
▼