Some believe that tax on companies should be introduced to reduce industrial pollution. Others believe that other measures should be taken to solve the problem. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Some people have faith in imposing a tax on industrial companies to diminish pollution ,

however

, other individuals consider different ways to tackle the problem.There are merits to taxing factories

such

as increasing the country's GDP

as well as

reducing harmful sources to be produced.

Nonetheless

, the factories should be located outskirts rather than demanding tariffs. In my own opinion levy should be excised. Production should be allocated outside the city as the other measure to solve the problem to reduce health complications that usually come with breathing polluted air,

for

example

, asthma. To add on , ZERA is the gas company in Zimbabwe it moved from the main capital city to locate in remote areas ,

therefore

it reduces the capacity of airborne sickness to the people. The advantage of taxing these industries may

also

lead to

the

Correct article usage

an

show examples

increase

of

Change preposition

in

show examples

the government 'GDP which can be used to cater for other institutions' sectors

for

example

, to pay teachers,

the

Correct word choice

and the

show examples

army, and build infrastructure.Moreso, these manufacturing processes may reduce the production of harmful products if the levy is too high.

In addition

,

for

example

, in Rwanda, the country is developing

due to

taxation

as well as

clean and the globalisation ozone layer is not interrupted by the pollutant air thereby ,the season rain is not affected neither agriculture or fishing. In conclusion, other believes that levy companies lessen pollutants

therefore

imposing them, brings increasing in the state's GDP which can be used in other departments .

Moreover

, other human beings enquire about alternatives non other than taxation,

for

example

, relocation of the factories outskirts of the cities. In conclusion, I believe the tax should be levied to reduce the industry pollutants as its advantages outweigh other measures.