It is argued that the
government
should bear the medical expenses of its citizens, Use synonyms
while
others believe that the individuals are themselves responsible for covering the costs, Linking Words
However
, I strongly believe that it is the state's duty to provide medical care to Linking Words
people
free of charge.
It is a basic fundamental right of Use synonyms
people
to receive state-funded medical facilities, Use synonyms
therefore
it is essential for authorities to provide quality health coverage regardless of an individual's status, gender and financial status. Linking Words
For instance
, the Linking Words
government
of Canada made medical care for all of its nation free of cost, Use synonyms
this
led to an increase in the life expectancy of Linking Words
people
and they have great approval for their Use synonyms
government
services Use synonyms
overall
. Linking Words
Furthermore
, I believe the Linking Words
government
has a vast collection of taxes which makes it capable of easily funding the health infrastructure.
Medical care is a costly expense, and not everyone is in a position to pay for it. In third-world countries, many Use synonyms
people
live below Use synonyms
poverty
line, and it is nearly impossible for them to afford Add an article
the poverty
this
ordeal. Linking Words
This
Linking Words
further
elevates moral authority to provide quality and accessible healthcare services, especially to the lower classes of the population, Linking Words
for example
, A minor heat surgery costs nearly 1000 dollars in India, and an Indian citizen who bearly makes 200 dollars a month, simply cannot afford it. The easily attainable medical facilities are essential for improving Linking Words
people
's health and standards of living.
Use synonyms
To conclude
, I again reiterate that the Linking Words
government
should be responsible for covering medical expenses since it is a fundamental right and beneficial for poor Use synonyms
people
.Use synonyms
shahroz99dev