The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
✨ Do you want to improve your IELTS writing?
The line graph below demonstrates the average carbon dioxide (CO2) discharge per human in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal from 1967 and 2007.
Overall
Linking Words
, the United Kingdom has the highest extent of emissions per person,
whereas
Linking Words
Portugal still has the lowest bulk of CO2 per human
To begin
Linking Words
with, an individual in the United Kingdom used to release an average of 11 metric oodles of CO2 into the atmosphere. In 2007, he or she would only emit below 9 metric
tons
Use synonyms
. Sweden’s discharge varied, starting out at just above 8 metric thousand kilograms, going up to approximately 11, and
then
Linking Words
rapidly decreasing in the next 30 years or so, ending at about 5 metric
tons
Use synonyms
of CO2 emitted.
In contrast
Linking Words
, Italy started out at barely 4 metric
tons
Use synonyms
, but since
then
Linking Words
, the number has gone up to just shy of 8 metric
tons
Use synonyms
of CO2 radiation per person.
Lastly
Linking Words
, in 1967, Portugal was only around 1 metric ton per man. The volume
then
Linking Words
gradually increased, until it reached a peak in 2007, overlapping Sweden.
Submitted by minhlieu.hnd on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Sentences: Add more complex sentences.
Introduction: The introduction is missing.
Introduction: Change the first sentence in the introduction.
Conclusion: The conclusion is too long.
Introduction: The chart intro is missing.
Introduction: The chart intro is missing.
Vocabulary: Rephrase your introduction. Words match: 86%.
Vocabulary: Replace the words co, tons with synonyms.
What to do next:
Look at other essays: