People argue that individuals in political roles can occasionally lie when doing so is necessary for their
country
or must be all the time honest with
society
. The first
group
believes that politics is not a ground to show off the high-value traits and sometimes covering the truth is the best way to protect a nation.
However
, the second
group
consider clarity as the primary criterion for a politician. In my opinion, being honest all the time and
haveWrong verb form
show examples
the skill to manage
the Correct article usage
show examples
hard situations is better than trying to hide the facts that one day will
revealsCorrect subject-verb agreement
show examples
.
On the one hand, there is a
group
of persons who deeply believe that in order to act properly in
politicFix the agreement mistake
show examples
, you should be able to lie without hesitation. They argue that in the field of politics
lieCorrect subject-verb agreement
show examples
can
offersChange the verb form
show examples
significant advantages.
For instance
, about two months ago the helicopter of the president of
RepublicCorrect article usage
show examples
of Islamic
of Change preposition
show examples
Iran had an accident which caused the death of the president.
Although
some unofficial press released the news of his
deadReplace the word
show examples
,
but Remove the conjunction
show examples
official channels
of Change preposition
show examples
the Correct article usage
show examples
national TV
ignored the news. The hesitation was
because of the prevention of shocking the
society
and
provideWrong verb form
show examples
the ground to announce the news.
Therefore
, the second
group
sees some value in
this
attitude.
On the other hand
, advocates of clarity assert the fact that being a successful person in the hard game of
politicCorrect your spelling
show examples
needs to be honest when you are explaining the details of your decisions or achievements on the press. They claim that a person who wants to play a role in the leadership of a
country
should have all of the knowledge and managerial skills to navigate the
society
inChange preposition
show examples
the
path
,Remove the comma
show examples
while
declaring all of the facts to the people of the
country
.
For example
,
UnitedCorrect article usage
show examples
States of America is one of the nations with
highestChange the article
show examples
clarity in the political structures. The power of
nationAdd an article
show examples
in front of the government always
protectChange the verb form
show examples
the Correct article usage
show examples
society
's
rightFix the agreement mistake
show examples
and they always expect
the Correct article usage
show examples
clarification regarding all the issues.
Thus
,
it is clear that
there is a significant effect on the national benefits
inChange preposition
show examples
this
specific approach.
In my point of view, if a politician takes
advantagesFix the agreement mistake
show examples
of covering the truth, there is a high chance of deviation from the path of leading the
country
with true desires. There are some instances throughout
the Correct article usage
show examples
history
,Remove the comma
show examples
when a leader just stepped out of the right path of leadership moment after their first lie.
In conclusion, as long as there might be some benefits in not telling the truth for
politicianFix the agreement mistake
show examples
, I believe that an individual with
moreCorrect article usage
show examples
straight forwardCorrect your spelling
show examples
attitude and clear plate can act better in the game of politics.