Many people believe that it is the government’s responsibility to take
of its
’ welfare, including providing free health
and
,
others contend that it is not necessary. In my opinion, a balanced approach would help tackle
issue more effectively.
On the one hand, proponents of the first point of view have several reasons to justify their position.
, they point out that
pay so many kinds of tax on a yearly basis that they should have the right to benefit from the public funds without paying additional
costFix the agreement mistake
show examples
.
,
are the major factor which decides one country’s prosperity. A country that takes good
of its people, will have the possibility to develop comprehensively.
, if
could access
to Change preposition
show examples
free schooling regardless of their socioeconomic status, the intellectual level of the population would improve and
help work on unemployment problems.
,
would not only enhance countries’ prosperity but
social harmony.
, individuals who support the alternative stance
have points to prove their opinion. They assume that public finances
hasChange the verb form
show examples
limitationFix the agreement mistake
show examples
and should be spent efficiently.
, there are many urgent issues requiring the authorities ‘ attention
as urban infrastructures and national security.
,
will put a dent in public coffers if national leaders
could notWrong verb form
show examples
decide what should be their top concern.
From my perspective,
it is the government
whoCorrect pronoun usage
show examples
is responsible for
people’Change noun form
show examples
lives, they should pay
fullCorrect article usage
show examples
cost for only
and support the public in
services with other measures. I personally think that
well qualifiedAdd a hyphen
show examples
is
such Correct quantifier usage
show examples
aCorrect article usage
show examples
main key for a country to thrive, so it is an essentially worthy investment by providing free schooling to all
.
, speaking of
, paying full cost for all relatable services is not really a suitable method which can be disadvantageous in several ways. In explanation, receiving too much welfare may lead to
theCorrect article usage
show examples
lack of awareness in the population of taking
of themselves.
of providing free
, governments should wisely allocate the budget respectively for each category’s importance
thenCorrect word choice
show examples
bring in new policies for
services
as providing them with insurance
suitable for each kind of socioeconomic status.
, the public funds could be used more effectively and thoroughly.
In conclusion,
both points of view are reasonable, I think
should give a helping hand in
paymentFix the agreement mistake
show examples
to lift some weight off the government’s shoulders and have the
fundFix the agreement mistake
show examples
invested in
and other needs of society.