Many people believe that it is the government’s responsibility to take 
 of its 
’ welfare, including providing free health 
 and 
, 
 others contend that it is not necessary. In my opinion, a balanced approach would help tackle 
 issue more effectively.
On the one hand, proponents of the first point of view have several reasons to justify their position. 
, they point out that 
 pay so many kinds of tax on a yearly basis that they should have the right to benefit from the public funds without paying additional 
costFix the agreement mistake
show examples
 . 
, 
 are the major factor which decides one country’s prosperity. A country that takes good 
 of its people, will have the possibility to develop comprehensively. 
, if 
 could access 
to Change preposition
show examples
 free schooling regardless of their socioeconomic status, the intellectual level of the population would improve and 
 help work on unemployment problems. 
, 
 would not only enhance countries’ prosperity but 
 social harmony.
, individuals who support the alternative stance 
 have points to prove their opinion. They assume that public finances 
hasChange the verb form
show examples
  limitationFix the agreement mistake
show examples
  and should be spent efficiently. 
, there are many urgent issues requiring the authorities ‘ attention 
 as urban infrastructures and national security. 
, 
 will put a dent in public coffers if national leaders 
could notWrong verb form
show examples
  decide what should be their top concern. 
From my perspective, 
 it is the government 
whoCorrect pronoun usage
show examples
  is responsible for 
people’Change noun form
show examples
  lives, they should pay 
fullCorrect article usage
show examples
  cost for only 
 and support the public in 
 services with other measures. I personally think that 
well qualifiedAdd a hyphen
show examples
   is 
such Correct quantifier usage
show examples
 aCorrect article usage
show examples
  main key for a country to thrive, so it is an essentially worthy investment by providing free schooling to all 
. 
, speaking of 
, paying full cost for all relatable services is not really a suitable method which can be disadvantageous in several ways. In explanation, receiving too much welfare may lead to 
theCorrect article usage
show examples
  lack of awareness in the population of taking 
 of themselves. 
 of providing free 
, governments should wisely allocate the budget respectively for each category’s importance 
thenCorrect word choice
show examples
  bring in new policies for 
 services 
 as providing them with insurance 
 suitable for each kind of socioeconomic status. 
, the public funds could be used more effectively and thoroughly. 
In conclusion, 
 both points of view are reasonable, I think 
 should give a helping hand in 
 paymentFix the agreement mistake
show examples
  to lift some weight off the government’s shoulders and have the 
fundFix the agreement mistake
show examples
  invested in 
 and other needs of society.