Some people believe that governments should spend money on the arts. Others assert that this money should be used to improve public services and infrastructure.

In the modern world, it is thought that governments ought to invest money in the arts, meanwhile, many people confirm that a more beneficial way is spending

this

budget on public services and infrastructure. In my view, investing in public services is more essential rather than the arts. On the one hand, some people are deeply into artwork, viewing it as a way to express cultural identity.

While

spending finance on urban development, we shouldn't neglect our theatres, music and dance, as they represent the cultural heritage of our society. Populations with rich traditions in music and poetry are often considered politer and possess broader horizons. In many developed countries, individuals who appreciate craft spend significant amounts of funds to support it.

Additionally

, art can help enrich cultural vitality, enhance happiness, and improve the

overall

quality of life.

Moreover

, art can bring people together, providing opportunities for social interaction, community building, and understanding diverse perspectives.

On the other hand

, it is widely accepted that spending funds on the arts can be seen as a waste of capital.

Therefore

, it is necessary to invest in public well-being, economic stimulation, and basic needs.

For instance

, comprehensive developments like new roads, construction, and increased cycling infrastructure provide convenience for individuals commuting to work and for community buildings.

For example

, expanding roads can reduce traffic congestion.

Moreover

, an increase in public transport options,

such

as buses, will help students and workers reach their destinations more quickly and safely.

To conclude

,

while

opinions may vary, I believe that investing in public services provides practical benefits.