Some people argue that
open Add a hyphen
show examples
plan
offices
are more advantageous than normal
offices
. In my opinion, normal
offices
have many more advantages than open
planFix the agreement mistake
show examples
.
There are several reasons why I would argue against
openCorrect article usage
show examples
plan
.
Firstly
,
open Add a hyphen
show examples
plan
offices
are designed to fit all the
employersCorrect your spelling
show examples
in one place, which leads to over-fitting of the work zone, leaving
lessCorrect quantifier usage
show examples
and
lessCorrect quantifier usage
show examples
personal zones for each employee.
Secondly
, cramming so many people into one space causes headaches and other health problems because of the noise.
For example
, I remember having constant headaches during my experience of working in an open space.
Finally
, I believe that doing work in an open place office will critically affect the efficiency of workers
due to
the toxic community of
such
working environments.
I believe that normal
offices
should never be replaced. It is much more beneficial to have a personalised working zone for each employer, where they are not under the pressure of nearby colleagues.
In addition
, working in a normal office environment will significantly increase productivity by eliminating all unnecessary noise. It will
also
make managers' jobs easier by making it easier to find a particular person. If office managers choose normal
offices
instead
of open space
offices
, many thousands of people could be properly equipped and treated.
In conclusion, my
viesCorrect your spelling
show examples
is that CEOs should spend money on
the Correct article usage
show examples
normal
offices
instead
of open
placeFix the agreement mistake
show examples
, and it is wrong to waste money on
the Correct article usage
show examples
offices
that will negatively affect the workers.