Some people believe older employees are more useful to a company. Others believe that younger employees are more useful in modern world. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Staff

is

a

Correct article usage

the

show examples

backbone of an entire company, and there is a dispute over whether younger or older employees are more beneficial to an organization. Even though young

staff

have more contemporary knowledge and fewer health issues, I advocate for older generation, because they are more experienced so will not make the repeated mistakes; plus, are able to guide new members. After many serving years, experienced

staff

has the knowledge of many reoccurred problems and the necessary approaches to them. IT companies value senior programmers and pay

to

Change preposition

apply

show examples

them twice, even if not three times as much

to

Change preposition

as

show examples

juniors thanks to their ability to complete comprehensive tasks properly and rapidly.

Moreover

, little can juniors accomplish something complex if they are not curated by the knowledgeable. Not only can they hand out assignments

according to

the receiver’s skills but

also

assist them in case of setbacks. Generally, ways old

staff

used to tackle problems tend to get out-of-date;

for example

, recently graduated doctors are able to utilize up-to-date equipment which previous employees cannot use.

In addition

, the older you get,

more

Correct article usage

the more

show examples

health related

Add a hyphen

health-related

show examples

snags you have which is not quite advantageous for a company since they might have to fund your hospital expenses. Summing up, younger workers are all very well as their comprehension and health

is

Change the verb form

are

show examples

more modern and stable respectively. Yet, I still consider old employees to be more profitable for a company because youngsters are nowhere near as experienced as they are;

also

, they can explain to “newbies” what’s what.