Some employers reward members of staff for their exceptional contribution to the company by giving them extra money. This practice can act as an incentive for some but may also have a negative impact on others. To what extent is this style of management effective? Are there better ways of encouraging employees to work hard?

In the business context, rewarding outstanding
performance
has been a
frequently-used
Correct your spelling
frequently used
show examples
method. It motivates good employees to
work
more diligently. Yet, there are
also
drawbacks affecting the morale of others who could not meet the standard of
work
.
As a result
,
this
passage will deliberate its effectiveness in managing the organization and other compensational alternatives for exceptional contributions.
To begin
with, the
system
of awarding employees is essential for human resource management. The way it works is that the
performance
of employees is carefully observed and acknowledged by the head of the firm. The distinct
work
will be rewarded highly. It can be financial, spiritual, or both. Mentally speaking, the one receiving the awards could be encouraged to
work
even harder. They can devote their time and effort to the success of the company.
Moreover
, if the
system
is well-developed and fair between punishment and rewards, others who cannot achieve satisfactory results will perform more competently. Yet, there is some negative feedback regarding
this
human-managing method. The
system
is only effective if it has clear criteria for evaluating
staff
performance
which means that it must clarify the definition of over-achievement and
the
Correct article usage
apply
show examples
under-
performance
. In the case of unclear clarification, it may mislead to the fact that the underperforming
staff
is unhappy that they may get mistreated in the workplace.
In addition
, the administrative level of business can reconsider
this
rewarding phenomenon as time and resource-consuming when it doesn't accomplish what the organization set it out to be - a way to encourage
staff
and enhance organizational
performance
.
Therefore
, a business should take various approaches to implement the existing
system
. One of the alternatives is to evaluate the long-term
work
efficiency of personnel. If the workers have outperformed for a definite time, the company should consider the promotion to a better salary and position for them thoroughly.
Last
but not least, many training systems exist in the workplace. The training section is an opportunity in which exceptional human resources can share their experience with others so that the team can improve their
work
efficiencies. In short, the reward
system
for outperforming
staff
encourages them to contribute more.
However
, it may
also
demoralize the under-achieving ones if there aren't any
clearly-defined
Correct your spelling
clearly defined
show examples
requirements to define what could have counted for over-accomplishment.
Then
it is a time-consuming but ineffective
system
. Generally, the organization could exploit the promotion process and training section to motivate the
staff
spirit and working efficiencies.
Submitted by vinu052t on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

relevant specific examples
Ensure all examples are relevant and specific to enhance credibility. For instance, cite specific industries or companies where reward systems have been effective or problematic.
clear comprehensive ideas
Clarify some sentences to enhance readability. For example, 'Mentally speaking' can be simplified to 'Psychologically' for better academic tone.
complete response
The essay presents a balanced view on the effectiveness of reward systems, discussing both positive and negative aspects.
introduction conclusion present
The introduction and conclusion are well-defined, encapsulating the main points effectively.
logical structure
The essay is logically structured, with distinct paragraphs discussing different aspects of the topic.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: