Some people think that the goverment should strictly control the supply of fresh water, as it is a limited resource , while others it should not be regulated. Discuss both the sides and give your opinion

There is no denying the fact that

people

believe that constraints should be applied on the use of

water

,

While

it is a commonly held belief that the government has to be strict regarding following specific usage regulations, there is

also

an argument that opposes it. There are arguments on both sides,

however

, which we will discuss here.

To begin

with,

water

is the only drink that all creatures on earth use whether they are

human

Fix the agreement mistake

humans

show examples

or animals, rich or poor, sick or well.

Furthermore

,it might be said that

water

is one of the earth's finite resources and there is a future worry that

people

will die out of thirst.

This

could be attributed to

people

's lack of awareness and false attitudes.

For example

, during morning baths, individuals tend to keep the

water

running

while

they are engaged in washing up and shaving.

Moreover

, schools, hospitals, and other social institutions do not educate their pupils on how to treat

water

as a valuable beverage.

Finally

, these kinds of

behavior

Change the spelling

behaviour

show examples

could lead to devastating environmental phenomena.

On the other hand

, A practical solution for

this

problem might be paying fines and raising the

water

consumption fees. Following that, it is important to mention that if the country regulates the use of

water

, it is the poor ones who will mainly suffer.

In addition

,

this

will not guide the citizens on how to benefit from

water

wisely,In

instead

they will keep wasting it disruptively. In conclusion, despite

people

having different views, I strongly believe

water

is limited and nations should come up with logical solutions and serious punishments to protect it.