In modern society, many people think primary schools should teach science and technology rather than history and geography, which are useless and boring. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?

The matter of the fact is that modern society expects its students and prospective professionals with an all-round pool of knowledge and skills. The topic statement clearly plays favourite with sciences

while

belittling liberal arts, which, in my view, is biased and misleading, and may

also

cause negative influences among students. Those people who advocate that only science and technology

subjects

should be taught at school are ignorant of what knowledge is composed of. They fail to understand the relationships between different

subjects

and their mutual overlap; they only see the individual trees in the forest, rather than the forest as a whole. A student cannot learn science well without a basic knowledge of human evolution and scientific history. In order to learn technology well, a student must start from the very basics of geography

that

Correct pronoun usage

which

show examples

deals with the interaction of the diverse physical, biological and cultural features of the earth’s surface.

Furthermore

, I feel that those people may indeed be somewhat short-sighted as they see nothing but the possible commercial benefits that science and technology products could generate. It is true that state-of-the-art devices are an important part of our lives, but

this

should not mean that the achievements of other

subjects

are brushed aside. A society needs well-educated people in all fields, including history, geography, and many others like arts and music. They are equally important as sciences, and all play a significant and expansive role in

the

Correct article usage

apply

show examples

society. In the final analysis, the primary school is a seat of learning to develop intelligence and talents. There should not be any prejudice at all towards a series of

subjects

offered.