the bar chart compares the recycling rates of four different kinds of waste material in a city from 1992 to 2002, Percentage of different type of waste recycled. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

the bar chart compares the recycling rates of four different kinds of waste material in a city from 1992 to 2002, Percentage of different type of waste recycled. 

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates the percentages of four different waste recycled in one city in 1992, 1997 and 2002. At first glance, it is obvious in 2002 the proportions of recycling in each group were more than two other ones.
First,
glass had been selected for reproducing more than other trash during these years. Statistically, glass started at around 15 per cent and
then
reached 50 per cent in 2002. Obviously, cans had the lowest percentage in the beginning which was approximately 9%.
However
, in 1997 tins overtook plastic
then
it was placed at third grade. Clearly, 1997 was in the middle of proportions between all 3 years.
Overall
, the chart shows all four types of waste which were recycled from 1992 to 2002.
Subsequently
, they were almost in order glass, paper, tins and plastic.
Nevertheless
, in the beginning, plastic was more than cans which was around 1 per cent in 1992.
Submitted by sarvin.rahimi9898 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Vocabulary: The word "chart" was used 2 times.
Vocabulary: The word "percentages" was used 2 times.
Vocabulary: The word "proportions" was used 2 times.
Vocabulary: The word "around" was used 2 times.
What to do next:
Look at other essays: