The issue of whether the
government
has a
responsibility
to
people
’s housing has sparked considerable debate, with some
people
arguing that
people
’s housing is outside the
government
’s
responsibility
while
others believe that
administrationCorrect article usage
show examples
should arrange for
people
to live. In
this
essay, I will discuss both views but personally, I agree that the
government
has no obligation to accommodate
people
.
To begin
with, it is understandable why some
people
support that the
has no
responsibility
toChange preposition
show examples
people
’s housing. A primary reason is private sector can better address housing needs through market-driven solutions and innovation, as
this
approach
competitionChange preposition
show examples
in the housing market can lead to
moreAdd an article
show examples
efficient allocation of resources and faster development.
For example
, individuals who follow the
government
shouldn’t
hasChange the verb form
show examples
responsibilityAdd an article
the responsibility
a responsibility
show examples
toChange preposition
show examples
housing shortages often find that
privateCorrect article usage
show examples
sector is better able to meet
people
’s housing needs.
Furthermore
, many
that
government
involvement in housing can lead to inefficiencies and bureaucratic delays, which may hinder timely solutions, as it provides public housing projects can be subject to lengthy planning and approval
, delaying their completion.
Thus
, the reasoning behind
this
perspective is understandable and has merit.
However
, I would argue that the
government
should
providingChange the verb form
show examples
housing is
also
logical. A significant reason is the
government
can provide affordable housing solutions that may not be profitable for private developers, addressing the needs of low-income citizens, which can
throughCapitalize word
show examples
subsidies, public housing projects, or rent controls, governments can ensure that housing remains accessible.
For example
,
government
assistance can not only relieve the pressure
ofChange preposition
show examples
low-income
people
,Remove the comma
show examples
but
also
help them to solve the problem of food and clothing.
Additionally
, publicly funded
initiatives can address systemic
,
such
as land scarcity and high costs, which private markets might not resolve, as
it Correct pronoun usage
show examples
governments can regulate zoning laws and provide incentives for affordable housing developments.
Therefore
this
approach
alsoAdd a missing verb
show examples
sustainable.
In conclusion,
while
governmentCorrect article usage
show examples
providing housing has
decreaseWrong verb form
show examples
low-income
citizen’sFix the agreement mistake
show examples
pressure and solving systemic problems lays the foundation for sustainable urban development, I believe that the
government
is not in charge of housing
providesCorrect word choice
show examples
a more practical and balanced approach.