Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
There has been a contentious debate about whether university
students
should choose a subject based on their willingness or have a regulation to guide some students
into the fields
with socioeconomic advantages. I believe a balanced approach might be a better solution to answer individual interests while
aligning with societal needs.
On the one hand, maintaining an environment that allows pursuing majors out of passion contributes to fostering innovative and motivational academic approaches in all areas besides
individual fulfilment. Therefore
, as a result
of this
improvement, creativity rockets and helps deepen knowledge across various fields
. For example
, students
with competence, talents, and skills to work on expanding AI utilization may come up with some ground-breaking ideas because of the intrinsic motivation they have to continue their profession, whereas
obligating them to study other aspects of science would not have the same result.
On the other hand
, advocates of focusing on fields
with profound benefits to the economy and society approach believe that, particularly in an era of rapid technological advancements, subjects such
as computer science, engineering, and biotechnology have a fundamental role in driving innovation, solving national and global challenges and bringing substantial eco-societal growth. With this
perspective, spotted weaknesses and gaps in different fields
can be worked on to ensure sustainable developments over time. For instance
, if a nation is in conflict to solve some financial issues, having some graduates with expertise in financial problems can help to solve them and prevent forthcoming potential threads in that area.
In conclusion, although
national priorities in science, technology, and other areas are essential for further
future progression, restricting students
solely to these fields
would put academic freedom in danger. A multidisciplinary approach, which brings in opportunities for students
to chase their interests while
recognizing the importance of holistic education, might be the most advantageous.Submitted by Ali Davoodi on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task achievement
While your essay explores both views effectively, providing further development in some areas could enhance the depth of analysis. For instance, you could expand on how allowing students to choose freely could impact certain industries or societal aspects more broadly.
coherence cohesion
Some of the transitions between ideas could be smoother. You might consider using more varied linking words and phrases to create seamless connections between paragraphs. This can enhance the overall flow.
coherence cohesion
Your essay has a clear and well-defined introduction and conclusion, addressing the prompt directly and strongly integrating your personal opinion.
task achievement
You effectively discuss both sides of the argument, providing relevant examples and clear reasoning. This shows a good balance of perspectives.