The funds for postgraduate research are limited; therefore, some people think that financial support from the government should be provided. However, only scientific research should be funded, rather than other, less useful subjects. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In order for
government
Correct article usage
the government
show examples
and the societies they control to improve, it is necessary that
support
be provided to the next generation of thinkers who pursue postgraduate studies. With
this
idea of government
support
in mind, we have to consider putting all of the funding towards
science
, which is the controversial stance that some desire. Providing the entirety of the money towards
science
is a horrible idea, as arts and communication are equally deserving of
this
postgraduate financing.
Although
some might
support
the idea of only funding
science
, they would be incorrect because the Arts are just as valuable and deserving of monetary
support
. Not only does
art
promote creativity, but
also
it enlightens others about culture in ways that
science
cannot accomplish.
Science
is an example of creativity, but it is not as expressive as
art
because when we witness
art
we get a glimpse of the nature of the universe and the creative insights of the human brain in ways not limited by
science
.
In addition
to
this
convincing point, one of the primary ways we learn about other cultures is when their
art
is brought to our museums, and
science
is more universal which means it does not get into specific cultural norms. The arguments presented here are convincing, but we have one more persuasive topic to cover. There is too much focus on
science
in our modern times and
as a result
, we are losing the aspects of ourselves that have gotten through changes in civilization.
Science
has been looked at as almost having god-like qualities, but actually, the areas of
art
and communication are equally valuable. Successful relationships are based on communication, not
science
.
Submitted by bajahzar90 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task achievement
You provide a complete response to the task, presenting a clear opinion against exclusive funding for scientific research. For higher scores, you could enhance your arguments with more specific examples or data.
coherence cohesion
Your essay is logically structured, with a clear introduction and conclusion. However, ensure that each paragraph clearly relates to your central thesis for even better coherence.
task achievement
Your points would be stronger if they were supported by specific examples or evidence, particularly when discussing cultural insights in art.
introduction conclusion present
You have a strong, clear introduction that sets the stage for your argument effectively.
clear comprehensive ideas
You make a compelling case for the value of arts alongside sciences, touching on creativity and cultural insights.
logical structure
You maintain a logical flow throughout the essay, making it easy for readers to follow your argument.

Include an introduction and conclusion

A conclusion is essential for IELTS writing task 2. It is more important than most people realise. You will be penalised for missing a conclusion in your IELTS essay.

The easiest paragraph to write in an essay is the conclusion paragraph. This is because the paragraph mostly contains information that has already been presented in the essay – it is just the repetition of some information written in the introduction paragraph and supporting paragraphs.

The conclusion paragraph only has 3 sentences:

  • Summary
  • Restatement of thesis
  • Prediction or recommendation

Example:

To summarize, a robotic teacher does not have the necessary disciple to properly give instructions to students and actually works to retard the ability of a student to comprehend new lessons. Therefore, it is clear that the idea of running a classroom completely by a machine cannot be supported. After thorough analysis on this subject, it is predicted that the adverse effects of the debate over technology-driven teaching will always be greater than the positive effects, and because of this, classroom teachers will never be substituted for technology.

Start your conclusion with a linking phrase. Here are some examples:

  • In conclusion
  • To conclude
  • To summarize
  • Finally
  • In a nutshell
  • In general

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: