It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct (e.g. Dinosaurs, dodos, etc.) There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening. Do you agree or disagree?
With an increasing number of animals enlisted in protection catalogues, there has been a dissent that
extinction
is a natural process with which people
should not interfere. In my view, the opinion overemphasises the importance of Darwinism
so that overlooks people
's determination to preserve themselves by protecting endangered animals.
Although
the passage endeavours to defend people
's efforts to prevent extinction
, the supporters of Darwinism
are
Verb problem
apply
also
with some reasons. For illustration, they are reasonable in claiming that if people
disproportionately intervene in natural progress, consequences are usually beyond control. One compelling example is seen in Australia, where the
scientists once contrived to save Correct article usage
apply
land
parrots
from extinction
by introducing foxes as the natural enemies of rats, which ate land
parrots
' eggs. However
, contrary to the original expectation, the foxes introduced found land
parrots
were better prey, which worsened the situation of land
parrots
and consequently
accelerated the extinction
of the species. In light of this
, it seems plausible to claim that people
's efforts will only exacerbate situations, and they ought to be satisfied with the role of observers.
However
, this
perspective to a large degree neglects people
's determination to refuse tamely submit their future to nature. The modern society is highly dependent on bio-products, food, medicine, or textile. For example
, it is inconceivable to produce fruits without bees, and therefore
if humans allow natural selection to exterminate bees, if humans show "respect" for Darwinism
, it is not different from committing suicide. In light of this
, the passage is inclined to view the
Correct article usage
apply
human's
endeavours to prevent Change noun form
human
extinction
as an effort to take control of our own future, which actually is what humans have done across millions, using the brain to emerge from nature.
In summary, the passage can understand the apprehension of the supporters of Darwinism
, as there are some examples of people
's intervention in natural selection brought
undesirable consequences. Despite Wrong verb form
bringing
this
, if we forsake these efforts, it equals to submit
ourselves totally to nature's control, which is more undesirable, and Change the verb form
submitting
therefore
the
Correct article usage
apply
human
had better continue to explore along the road of stopping Fix the agreement mistake
humans
extinction
.Submitted by hx88375757 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
Coherence and Cohesion
Ensure that transitions between ideas are smooth to enhance the flow of your argument.
Task Achievement
Provide more specific examples and evidence to back up your claims, which will strengthen your argument.
Task Achievement
Clarify some sections to maintain comprehensibility and avoid overly complex sentences.
Task Achievement
Your essay presents a balanced view, acknowledging both sides of the argument, which showcases a strong ability to evaluate.
Coherence and Cohesion
The introduction and conclusion clearly present the main ideas and wrap up your points effectively.
Coherence and Cohesion
Well-developed paragraphs that support your main points thoroughly.