Some people think that the government should invest more money in teaching science than other subjects for the progress of the country. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

These days, the subjects of teaching are so varied from the past.

For example

, a group of people believe that the main section of a developing

country

is that authorities fund

science

instead

of other subjects. I do not subscribe to

this

idea owing to the

fact

that

science

is a really important subject;

however

, other items are really necessary for developing and saving cultures. On the one hand, when the students do not read about their history, they cannot know about the reasons for their traditional celebrations and customs; in

fact

, the elements of cultures will be forgotten by future generations;

additionally

, the culture which is really crucial item will be lost in future;

as a result

, it is important that students in the schools learn about their history as same as sciences.

On the other hand

, sciences are one part of improving a

country

, but the other sections are not only politics but

also

the economy On account of the

fact

that when the sciences in one

country

are very good, they have just theory.

In other words

,

science

works on theoretical things

while

politics, economy and engineering help them play these ideas and make them into the items that have profits and benefits for the

country

to develop inasmuch as creating factories with high cost and less profit does not have efficiency.

To sum up

, in my opinion, the

fact

that

science

is an important factor for development, but when it is combined with other elements inasmuch as it cannot have an advantage alone;

furthermore

, culture aids society to survive;

consequently

, it is necessary that all subjects have the same investment.