Some people think that new houses should be built in the same style as older houses in the local area. Others disagree and say that local authorities should allow people to build houses in the styles of their own choice. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

✨ Do you want to improve your IELTS writing?
Many opine that newly built houses should match in
style
older
buildings
of the same area and that the exterior should be strictly regulated,
whereas
others believe that,
on the contrary
, it should be completely up to house owners.
This
essay will discuss both views and state an opinion that keeping the same architectural
style
must be obligatory. Many support the view that new
buildings
should be constructed in somehow the same
style
as other ones, which were built decades or, in some cases, centuries before. Keeping and building new houses in styles of previous eras, would not only make a particular city look more balanced and without dramatic contrasts but
also
preserve conventional styles, which is essential for every community.
Thus
,
this
essay agrees that the external look of brand-new
buildings
should be controlled and regulated. The principal example would be Copenhagen, where almost all new
buildings
are built in one
style
which matches older and historical
buildings
. Others believe that the government should allow house owners to determine the
style
of their estate. People do not like the idea of the authorities dictating to them how their home is supposed to look.
This
opinion is understandable,
however
, if nobody cares about the traditional
style
of the local area, all new
buildings
will look totally different, which will inevitably affect the entire town/city badly,
therefore
, the essay does not support
this
view.
To sum up
, it is fully understandable that many individuals want to decide the way their home should look, but it is more important that new houses stick to traditional styles in their local communities.
Submitted by mihailkryukov55 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task achievement
To further improve your task achievement, provide more specific examples or evidence to support your arguments. This would enhance the strength of your claims and provide more clarity to the reader.
coherence cohesion
You have established a clear structure with an introduction and conclusion, but consider further developing each paragraph with transition words and phrases to enhance the coherence and cohesion of your essay.
coherence cohesion
Ensure that each supporting point is well-explored with sufficient details, as this will improve the reader's understanding of your viewpoint.
task achievement
You provide a clear opinion in the introduction and conclusion, which aids in task achievement.
coherence cohesion
Your essay is generally well-organized with a logical progression of ideas, which shows good coherence.
task achievement
You use relevant examples, like Copenhagen, which supports your main argument effectively.

Your opinion

Don’t put your opinion unless you are asked to give it.

If the question asks what you think, you MUST give your opinion to get a good score.

Don’t leave your opinion until the conclusion.

Here are examples of instructions that require you to give your opinion:

...do you agree or disagree?...do you think...?...your opinion...?

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: