Many opine that newly built houses should match in
style
older Use synonyms
buildings
of the same area and that the exterior should be strictly regulated, Use synonyms
whereas
others believe that, Linking Words
on the contrary
, it should be completely up to house owners. Linking Words
This
essay will discuss both views and state an opinion that keeping the same architectural Linking Words
style
must be obligatory.
Many support the view that new Use synonyms
buildings
should be constructed in somehow the same Use synonyms
style
as other ones, which were built decades or, in some cases, centuries before. Keeping and building new houses in styles of previous eras, would not only make a particular city look more balanced and without dramatic contrasts but Use synonyms
also
preserve conventional styles, which is essential for every community. Linking Words
Thus
, Linking Words
this
essay agrees that the external look of brand-new Linking Words
buildings
should be controlled and regulated. The principal example would be Copenhagen, where almost all new Use synonyms
buildings
are built in one Use synonyms
style
which matches older and historical Use synonyms
buildings
.
Others believe that the government should allow house owners to determine the Use synonyms
style
of their estate. People do not like the idea of the authorities dictating to them how their home is supposed to look. Use synonyms
This
opinion is understandable, Linking Words
however
, if nobody cares about the traditional Linking Words
style
of the local area, all new Use synonyms
buildings
will look totally different, which will inevitably affect the entire town/city badly, Use synonyms
therefore
, the essay does not support Linking Words
this
view.
Linking Words
To sum up
, it is fully understandable that many individuals want to decide the way their home should look, but it is more important that new houses stick to traditional styles in their local communities.Linking Words
mihailkryukov55