Manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods or customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Many people argue that it is the responsibility of supermarkets and

manufacturers

to minimize unnecessary packaging on

products

,

while

others believe that the onus lies with

consumers

. In my view,

although

manufacturers

and retailers play a significant role, the primary responsibility falls on

consumers

to reduce environmentally harmful packaging. Given the fierce competition in the market, suppliers often rely on elaborate packaging to make their

products

stand out among similar goods.

Consequently

,

this

has led to the normalization of excessive wrapping, significantly contributing to environmental degradation.

Manufacturers

,

however

, are uniquely positioned to address

this

issue

due to

their resources and market influence.

For instance

, by adopting sustainable

practices

,

such

as using biodegradable materials or redesigning packaging to minimize

waste

, companies can make a substantial impact on reducing packaging

waste

. Major brands like Adidas and Nike exemplify

this

shift. Specifically, Adidas' initiative to replace plastic packaging with recycled materials across its distribution channels has not only minimized

waste

but

also

set a precedent for other companies.

This

demonstrates that when

manufacturers

prioritize eco-friendly

practices

, they can significantly mitigate environmental damage and inspire industry-wide change.

Nevertheless

,

such

efforts must be expanded across more industries to address the scale of the problem effectively.

On the other hand

,

consumers

have an equally critical role in driving market trends and promoting sustainability. By consciously choosing minimally packaged goods or

products

sold in bulk, buyers can directly influence the behaviour of

manufacturers

and retailers. A case in point is Sweden, where collective consumer advocacy has proven highly effective, leading to the government imposing taxes on environmentally harmful packaging materials.

This

illustrates how

consumers

can compel authorities to take action and push businesses toward adopting greener

practices

.

Moreover

,

consumers

who actively support brands prioritizing sustainability,

such

as those with eco-friendly packaging, amplify the demand for responsible business

practices

. By making informed choices and voicing concerns about unnecessary packaging,

consumers

can create ripple effects that encourage businesses to rethink their packaging strategies. In conclusion,

while

manufacturers

and supermarkets hold substantial responsibility for reducing packaging

waste

through sustainable innovations, I believe

consumers

play the most pivotal role.

Through

Change preposition

By

show examples

choosing environmentally conscious

products

and advocating for change, individuals can exert significant pressure on businesses and governments. Ultimately, the combined efforts of

manufacturers

adopting sustainable

practices

, as exemplified by Adidas, and empowered

consumers

driving change, as seen in Sweden, are essential to achieving meaningful progress in reducing environmentally harmful packaging.