Some countries have introduced laws to limit working hours for employees. Why are these laws introduced? Do you think they are a positive or negative development? You should write at least 250 words.
Working hours per week have been restricted by many nations. The primary reason for many countries to introduce these laws is to protect the workers, and I believe
this
is a good development as it creates more jobs.
First of all, the main reason for introducing such
restrictions by many governments is to save their citizens. That is
because many companies, without such
limitations, were forcing their employees to work longer shifts and more hours. Therefore
, after these limitations, a company can not exploit their employees.
Moreover
, this
is a positive development as it reduces unemployment as well. When people
are not allowed to work for more than a certain amount of time, their employers are forced to hire extra workers, thus
reducing unemployment. For example
, in the United Kingdom, the number of jobless people
decreased to half when this
law was introduced. Also
, this
has a beneficial effect on a person's health. When people
are not overworked, their physical and mental health improves and they can do their job more effectively, which also
increases productivity. For example
, after the limitation had been imposed in the EU, the number of people
taking days off from their work has reduced significantly.
In conclusion, this
limit was imposed by many governments to protect their citizens and the reduction in joblessness and improvement in general health means this
initiative has far more beneficial effects than drawbacks and thus
a good development. Therefore
, it is recommended that more states should make such
regulations in their country.Submitted by saadanwer89 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task achievement
The essay could include more detailed examples or statistical data from multiple countries to strengthen the argument.
coherence cohesion
While the coherence is strong, provide more linking phrases to further aid the reader's flow through the points.
coherence cohesion
The essay has a clear structure with a strong introduction and conclusion that summarize the main points effectively.
task achievement
The response fully addresses the task, explaining both why the laws are introduced and why they are seen as positive, with good justification.
task achievement
Examples like those from the United Kingdom and the EU effectively illustrate the points made in the essay.