The huge increase in the number of people with illnesses caused by air pollution from motor vehicles has led to calls for all motorised vehicles to be banned from town and city centres. To what extend do you agree or disagree with this suggestion ?
It is considered that banning
cars
, trucks and motos from metropoles would effectively answer health issues caused by air pollution. I personally agree that global warming requires taking
radical decisions. Correct your spelling
making
However
, I am concerned by the social consequences and the changes brought by this
proposition.
Global warming is a fact annually illustrated by scientists. A large majority of them recently urged governments from making more strong
efforts to control the warming and its health consequences like asthma, baby’s illnesses and so on. Around Fix the agreement mistake
stronger
one third
of the asked effort is about the reduction of motor vehicles’ pollution and air rejections. In front of it, it appears logical to ban vehicles from the urban Add a hyphen
one-third
centers
. Some European Nordic Change the spelling
centres
cities
like Copenhagen have successfully made this
decision with
developing alternatives like the Change preposition
by
improve
of public transportation and the Replace the word
improvement
cycles’
access.
Despite Change noun form
cycle’s
this
example of success
story, Add an article
a success
the success
prefer
some vehicles Wrong verb form
preferring
than
others Change preposition
over
in
that Change preposition
to
extend
brings negative impacts. Replace the word
extent
First,
it is considered that banning cars
from cities
strengthens the town’s attractivity for upper-revenues
people, but not for those who have less-paid jobs. People who cannot afford less-pollution Correct your spelling
upper-revenue
cars
would live in the cities
near the free car area
like Fix the agreement mistake
areas
the
hospital workers or Correct article usage
apply
the
policemen. Correct article usage
apply
This
decision could design a city where nobody who works for it can live in it. Consequently
, the population of these cities
could also
change years
after Fix the agreement mistake
year
years
by welcoming more retired people than young families. Businesses would not find advantages Fix the agreement mistake
year
to stay
in Change preposition
in staying
this
area despite invest
in more spacious buildings in sub-urban towns where workers live.
Wrong verb form
investing
To conclude
, if banning cars
from cities
seems to be a part of the global warming answer, I strongly recommend to side
Verb problem
siding with
this
decision by
social actions to maintain the economic attractivity and the happiness of living here.Change preposition
with
Submitted by remy.dejou on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task achievement
Try to develop your arguments with more specific examples to strengthen your position. This will make your essay more persuasive and demonstrate your depth of understanding.
supported main points
Ensure that each main point in your argument is supported by strong evidence. You could use data, statistics, or specific examples for support.
coherence cohesion
To improve coherence, make sure that each sentence flows logically from the one before and leads naturally to the next. Using linking words appropriately can help with this.
task achievement
The essay presents clear points for both agreement and disagreement with the proposition, showcasing a balanced approach.
introduction conclusion present
The introduction and conclusion effectively frame the argument, providing a comprehensive overview of the issue.
relevant specific examples
The essay introduces relevant contextual examples, such as the reference to Nordic cities, to support the argument.
Fully explain your ideas
To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).
For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:
- Paragraph 1 - Introduction
- Sentence 1 - Background statement
- Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
- Sentence 3 - Thesis
- Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
- Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
- Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
- Sentence 2 - Example
- Sentence 3 - Discussion
- Sentence 4 - Conclusion
- Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
- Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
- Sentence 2 - Example
- Sentence 3 - Discussion
- Sentence 4 - Conclusion
- Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
- Sentence 1 - Summary
- Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
- Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation
Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.