Should standardized testing be the primary method to assess educational achievement globally?
It is reported a 4% increase in SAT
test
takers from 2018, with over 2.2 million Use synonyms
students
taking the exam(College Board, 2019). Globally, there is an increasing trend that a significant number of Use synonyms
students
register for standardized Use synonyms
tests
Use synonyms
such
as IELTS and SAT. These standardized Linking Words
tests
are seen as a measure of student Use synonyms
abilities
, helping them open doors for future opportunities Use synonyms
such
as studying abroad and applying for scholarships. There is an opinion that standardized testing should be the official method to assess educational achievement globally and Linking Words
therefore
ought to spread Linking Words
further
. Linking Words
However
, standardized testing methods are not optimal because of validity and reliability issues and these Linking Words
exams
promote superficial learning.
The first reason why standardized testing should be reformed is Use synonyms
due to
its validity and reliability issues. Proponents of standardized Linking Words
exams
argue that these Use synonyms
tests
provide an objective way of student performance, providing a standard line for uniform comparisons across different educational systems. Standardized multiple-choice Use synonyms
tests
are considered uniform because they are machine-scored, eliminating the subjectivity of external factors. Use synonyms
However
, the individuals who construct these assessments have significant influence over the content and questions included. Meanwhile, Linking Words
test
developers are often disconnected from the classroom experience, resulting in a disconnect between the Use synonyms
test
material and what Use synonyms
students
have actually learned, thereby introducing biases into the evaluation process. Use synonyms
Moreover
, the determination of correct responses is subjective, as it relies on predefined criteria that may vary across different contexts. Linking Words
In other words
, these opinions fail to account for cultural differences and diverse learning styles, which can disadvantage Linking Words
students
from numerous backgrounds. Meadows and Karr-Kidwell (2001) stated that “standardized Use synonyms
test
publishers do not know the Use synonyms
students
for which they are designing the Use synonyms
test
. Use synonyms
Test
-writers can Use synonyms
also
make mistakes. Sometimes questions have two correct answers or none at all”. Linking Words
This
means that if Linking Words
students
choose two answers or leave an empty answer, there is no evidence Use synonyms
to conclude
their weak Linking Words
abilities
. Use synonyms
For example
, Linking Words
students
in America learn history from an Use synonyms
American’s
perspective, Change noun form
American
thus
they can have some different cultural norms, ideologies, Linking Words
values
compared to Vietnamese Correct word choice
and values
students
. American Use synonyms
students
can be taught to promote equality and freedom which reflects their political values, Use synonyms
in contrast
, the Vietnamese lens of history mainly focuses on patriotism and collective effort to fight the war. When a standardized Linking Words
test
includes content Use synonyms
of
American cultural contexts, Vietnamese Change preposition
from
students
might struggle, even if they are equally capable. Use synonyms
As a result
, the reliance on standardized Linking Words
exams
as a marker of assessing student’s Use synonyms
abilities
should be reconsidered.
Use synonyms
Secondly
, standardized Linking Words
tests
could encourage superficial learning rather than fostering a deeper understanding of knowledge. Supporters of standardized Use synonyms
exams
claim that Use synonyms
such
assessments prepare Linking Words
students
with a clear guideline for studying, thereby promoting active learning. Marzano (2003) explains that well-defined assessment standards serve as a guide for Use synonyms
Use synonyms
students'
learning, encouraging curriculum adherence and comprehensive knowledge acquisition. Correct your spelling
students
Otherwise
, in reality, standardized testing often leads to a focus on rote memorization and "teaching to the Linking Words
test
", which undermines deeper learning and critical thinking. To explain, Use synonyms
students
are taught to remember the trick to solve more problems as machines to get a higher grade in an exam, resulting in Use synonyms
students
being able to address similar problems they have learned. Use synonyms
While
Linking Words
this
might improve grades temporarily, it limits their ability to apply the knowledge to unfamiliar or complex scenarios. "Measuring student ability is not as straightforward as changing independent variables in an experiment, manually written questions can be interpreted differently, leading to varied interpretations despite similar academic Linking Words
abilities
" Kohn (2000).Use synonyms
Submitted by Andy on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
coherence cohesion
To improve coherence and cohesion, consider linking your ideas with clearer transitional phrases. This would help guide the reader more smoothly through your argument.
introduction conclusion
Include a brief conclusion that summarizes your main points and restates your position on the issue. This will help wrap up your essay neatly.
task achievement
While your examples are relevant, try to include a wider variety of examples from different sources or contexts to enrich your argument even further.
task achievement
The essay provides a thorough task response, clearly discussing both the potential benefits and drawbacks of standardized testing.
supported main points
The use of scholarly sources, such as Meadows and Karr-Kidwell, effectively supports the argument about the biases and validity issues of standardized tests.
logical structure
The main points are clearly organized and supported with specific examples, making the essay easy to follow and understand.
Include an introduction and conclusion
A conclusion is essential for IELTS writing task 2. It is more important than most people realise. You will be penalised for missing a conclusion in your IELTS essay.
The easiest paragraph to write in an essay is the conclusion paragraph. This is because the paragraph mostly contains information that has already been presented in the essay – it is just the repetition of some information written in the introduction paragraph and supporting paragraphs.
The conclusion paragraph only has 3 sentences:
- Summary
- Restatement of thesis
- Prediction or recommendation
Example:
To summarize, a robotic teacher does not have the necessary disciple to properly give instructions to students and actually works to retard the ability of a student to comprehend new lessons. Therefore, it is clear that the idea of running a classroom completely by a machine cannot be supported. After thorough analysis on this subject, it is predicted that the adverse effects of the debate over technology-driven teaching will always be greater than the positive effects, and because of this, classroom teachers will never be substituted for technology.
Start your conclusion with a linking phrase. Here are some examples:
- In conclusion
- To conclude
- To summarize
- Finally
- In a nutshell
- In general