Some people think that we should replace old buildings and houses in cities with more modern buildings. Other people think we should protect old buildings. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.

The improvement of the

city

's

buildings

and infrastructures has been going on over the years.

This

sparks a debate whether people should preserve the historical

buildings

o replace them with more modern ones. In my opinion, a balanced approach, incorporating both preservation and modernization, is the most practical solution. One reason people advocate for replacing old

buildings

is the need for urban spaces to meet modern demands.

For example

, older

structures

often lack energy efficiency, safety measures, or the capacity to support contemporary technologies. Cities like Tokyo have successfully modernized their infrastructure by replacing old houses with eco-friendly, earthquake-resistant

buildings

.

This

transformation not only improves living conditions but

also

enhances a

city

's economic potential and global competitiveness.

However

,

this

practice can sometimes erase the

city

's unique identity and disrupt communities rooted in historical neighbourhoods.

On the other hand

, preserving old

buildings

plays a crucial role in maintaining a

city

's cultural heritage. Historic landmarks

such

as the Eiffel Tower or traditional houses in Kyoto serve as tangible connections to a

city

's past, attracting tourism and fostering local pride.

For instance

, in Europe, cities like Prague have preserved medieval architecture that continues to be a significant economic driver through tourism.

However

, critics of

this

event argue that maintaining old

structures

can be costly and limit the

city

's capacity for growth and innovation. In conclusion, the debate between modernization and preservation highlights the need for a balanced approach to urban development.

While

modern infrastructures offer practical benefits, old

structures

provide cultural and historical value

that is

irreplaceable. Governments and urban planners should carefully evaluate which

structures

to preserve and which to replace, ensuring that cities remain both functional and culturally vibrant.