Introduction
Unquestionably, every coin has two sides and so are the people. Society’s people are divided into two groups and
therefore
personal information requirements by recruiters have become a topic of debate among people. Linking Words
This
essay will compare and contrast both of the opinions Linking Words
along with
my opinion which is in the favour of former view will be discussed in a sensible conclusion.Linking Words
Body paragraph 1
The supporters of the fact that enquiring employees about their personal data is completely normal and beneficial as well, demonstrate some significant logic.
For instance
, marital status shows a person's stability in one place, which means a person would not migrate to another city because of his family. Another reason would be the need for the ability to work in a situation where physical capability is needed. Linking Words
This
can be found out only by knowing their hobbies.Linking Words
Body paragraph 2
While
flipping the coin it is notable that others have adverse attitudes. The foremost reason for their disagreement is that asking about their private matter is a violation of privacy. Linking Words
For example
, some individuals, especially women, do not like to share whether they are married or single, and it is not their right to answer Linking Words
such
questions. Linking Words
In addition
, some data will not be crucial or relevant enough to be shared.Linking Words
Conclusion
In conclusion, gathering personal information is irrelevant in some cases
however
, the merits of Linking Words
this
kind of behaviour outweigh the demerits. In my opinion, answering Linking Words
this
type of question is totally fine, and it would Linking Words
also
be valuable for employers.Linking Words