There is an ongoing debate that funding art-related works is a waste of the government's budget.
While
I tend to oppose Linking Words
this
idea, I would have to support an adequate amount of money to be allocated as a form of diplomacy to boost a country's economic growth.
It is widely acknowledged that art is a form of soft diplomacy in which the regime can introduce a country's ideology and value to the global world through the least coercive strategy. Linking Words
That is
to say, funding musicians, painters, and writers can help them produce the best quality of works that can convey a subtle message of Linking Words
government's
agenda and ultimately attract foreign investment. Correct article usage
the government's
For example
, for the Linking Words
last
two decades, Korean dramas and singers have attracted many international fans to learn about Korean culture and visit the country.
Linking Words
On the other hand
, people may Linking Words
also
think that funding Linking Words
such
works is a mismanagement because they have Linking Words
a
very few vacancies, and require a small number of manpower. Correct article usage
apply
Therefore
many people do not see its direct benefits to their life sustainability. Linking Words
For example
, many students across countries are interested in pursuing art-related studies, Linking Words
however
looking at how the industry needs a lot of sacrifices in terms of time, energy, and money, they prefer to study Linking Words
major
that has a more promising income like Correct article usage
a major
engineer
.
In conclusion, it seems to me that it would be beneficial for the Add an article
an engineer
authority
to allocate an adequate amount of money for artists to introduce their nation worldwide, which can attract international investment and ultimately open a lot of employment opportunities.Fix the agreement mistake
authorities
nbmaulani