It is undeniable that punishing people who drive illegally ensures traffic safety, and many individuals believe measures should be strict.
Although
I can see convincing arguments behind punishing drivers for safety purposes, I strongly opine that a suitable system is the best way to decrease crime rates.
On the one hand, strict punishments have helped departments to make great achievements in the field of controlling drivers’ driving behaviours, attitudes and awareness. Linking Words
As a result
, the rate of traffic accidents in cities has declined; some cities even get zero. Linking Words
For instance
, Linking Words
according to
Linking Words
the
survey conducted by the University of Hong Kong, 22% of accidental traffic events, Correct article usage
a
such
as speeding, car crashes, and drunk driving, are controlled effectively.
Linking Words
On the other hand
, the mild approach to treating people has become more popular in society. Linking Words
Furthermore
, if strict measures were used too frequently on people, they might create a sense of worry about driving and lead to a loss of confidence in justice, Linking Words
instead
of mortifying their behaviour. Linking Words
For example
, Linking Words
provided
statistics by Verb problem
apply
Tokyo
University of Technology show that 65% of drivers prefer a mild approach rather than a strict one.
In conclusion, strict punishments do work to retard public driving awareness. Correct article usage
the Tokyo
Therefore
, Linking Words
it is clear that
the idea of running a strict system cannot be supported. After Linking Words
thorough
analysis Correct article usage
a thorough
on
Change preposition
of
this
subject, it is predicted that the adverse effects of the debate over strict measures will always be greater than the positive effects, and because of Linking Words
this
, a mild approach to treating illegal drivers is necessary.Linking Words
fangzheng200202