Many governments in the world spend large amounts of money on art which helps to develop quality in people’s life. However, governments should spend money on other things rather than art. Do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion.

Many governments invest in providing

art

Use synonyms

to their citizens, which contributes to culture and quality of life.

However

Linking Words

, priority should be given to funding other areas. I largely share

this

Linking Words

assessment. Many governments and states tend to spend exaggerated amounts of money on second or third necessity items,

as a result

Linking Words

of poor gestion and lack of assertiveness. As money is not unlimited, the most important needs must be prioritized, and

art

Use synonyms

is not one of them. Food, health, and education are important areas that need to be addressed and funded more urgently, and,

ideally

Add a comma

ideally,

show examples

everyone would have access to them

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

because they're crucial for

people

Use synonyms

's survival and development.

According to

Linking Words

a study, that talks about the pyramid of human needs, a person without health and housing will never value

art

Use synonyms

nor be able to appreciate it. Investing in shelters, public schools and hospitals

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

has a real impact on the quality of life of the

people

Use synonyms

who need it most.

For example

Linking Words

, a study from the University of California

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

indicated that governments that invest more in health, education, and housing, have happier citizens and a significant decrease in crime. In conclusion,

although

Linking Words

art

Use synonyms

contributes to

people

Use synonyms

's quality of life in all its forms, investing in areas that directly affect

people

Use synonyms

's well-being, should always be a central priority, especially those that have to do with humanitarian and survival issues