Some sections of society believe that
and drinks which are proven harmful to individuals by scientists should be banned from being sold in stores. I unequivocally agree with
Statement to a large extent
some viable points which will be discussed in the upcoming paragraphs.
To commence with, forbidding to sale of bad
and refreshment is a completely disproportionate measure because it is not usual to ban something.
forcing a stop to
saleFix the agreement mistake
show examples
, it is a good idea to mention on the label the harmful substances it contains. To be more precise, by mentioning
foodstuff Fix the agreement mistake
show examples
about the results of their consumption, people can stop purchasing items.
, as various energy drinks contain caffeine and alcohol , which are properly mentioned on the label, so majority of people avoid these substances, and usually they check the ingredients of various
refreshmentFix the agreement mistake
show examples
as Red Bull, Sting, and Boost.
, even though some foods or drinks are scientifically proven to be bad, banning them is not the solution.
Despite the aforementioned view, there are several factors which are bending towards the idea
isCorrect pronoun usage
show examples
declared unhealthy by science to consume should not be allowed to be sold. The prominent one is that banning
items can sustain the health and protect the lives of many. To enunciate it, non-availability of bad
in the shops means
mulitudesCheck wording
show examples
would not be able to buy them , which automatically saves many lives.
, a couple of years ago, there was news that Maggi contained lead
which was totally banned in the country. After clearing scientific testing, it afterwards comes to stored for sale.
Another reasonable factor is that forbidding unfit
can save huge funds to be spent on health by the majority of people. To justify it, when denizens consume only those
that are scientifically proven to be good , the chances of illness could decrease to a large extent.
is because multitudes mainly fell ill
Consumption , which contains harmful chemicals
,Punctuation problem
show examples
, scientific testing would eliminate these reasons.
, the death rates will deteriorate to some extent.
, it may be beneficial for both the country and the denizens to stop selling scientifically unfit
.
In conclusion,
banning
or snacks is not a good idea, it becomes necessary to stop selling those that fail to pass laboratory tests.