There has been a controversial topic on whether governments should invest in public
rather than private
. For once, technological advances have made it possible to mass-produce transport, particularly motorbikes and cars, to meet people’s demands, and
shift in decision to own a car has led to more purchases of private
.
I think
is understandably true, as it has certain advantages, supporting the other option is more beneficial not just for the country’s policy but
for individuals as a whole.
, expenditure on regulations to promote personal
can be convenient for many families. Specifically, public
as buses may only pick up passengers at fixed locations that have bus signs.
, it may be inconvenient, since if you miss one, you must wait until the next trip. Meanwhile, your own vehicle can be parked in a garage which you can use at your disposal.
, many remote regions may have few public
options at present.
places might be unsuitable
to buildChange preposition
show examples
and
constructWrong verb form
show examples
infrastructure to provide public amenities.
, many states in America
suchPunctuation problem
show examples
as
AlabamaPunctuation problem
show examples
have a low-density population, leading to slower
development.
, there is less public transit available and higher ownership of private
.
, public
is extremely environmentally friendly.
is because it can seat many people at the same time and consume much less fuel compared to individual usage.
, a metro can be packed with hundreds of passengers before it is full, and
it uses more fuel than a single car, it consumes far less than hundreds of private cars.
, many transport systems have started to use electricity
of relying on gasoline or petrol, which many personal
are still struggling with. Thereby, public
serves as a solution not just to reduce carbon emissions but
to lower the number of
on the road, which leads to traffic jams.
In conclusion, both choices have the aforementioned benefits and drawbacks.
, in a world driven by many unpredictable issues
as instability and climate change, it is safe to assume that investment in public transport must be considered critical and
prioritizedChange the spelling
show examples
for the betterment of society.