To solve the problem of traffic congestion govt should provide free public transport 24*7. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

✍️ Want to check your own essay?Try for free →
In the modern world, it is undeniable that traffic congestion has become a serious problem in many cities. Some people argue that governments should provide free public
transport
Use synonyms
around the clock as a solution.
Although
Linking Words
some may agree with
this
Linking Words
view, I partly support it
due to
Linking Words
several reasons, which will be examined in
this
Linking Words
essay. One of the most apparent reasons is that free public
transport
Use synonyms
can encourage people to reduce their reliance on private cars. To illustrate, when transportation is affordable and easily accessible, more individuals are likely to choose buses or trains
instead
Linking Words
of driving.
For instance
Linking Words
, removing fares can make public
transport
Use synonyms
more attractive, especially for low-income groups, which may lead to fewer vehicles on the road.
In addition
Linking Words
, a 24-hour system can provide greater convenience for people working irregular hours,
further
Linking Words
increasing usage. Another point that should not be overlooked is that providing completely free
transport
Use synonyms
may create financial and practical challenges. To clarify, maintaining a 24/7 system requires significant funding for infrastructure, staff, and maintenance.
For example
Linking Words
, governments may need to raise taxes or reduce spending in other important areas
such
Linking Words
as healthcare or education.
Furthermore
Linking Words
, free services alone may not solve congestion if the
transport
Use synonyms
system is overcrowded or inefficient.
Therefore
Linking Words
, improvements in service quality and traffic management are
also
Linking Words
necessary. To recapitulate, it is evident that free public
transport
Use synonyms
can reduce car usage and improve accessibility,
while
Linking Words
the main drawbacks include high costs and practical limitations.
Therefore
Linking Words
, I believe that
although
Linking Words
this
Linking Words
approach can be part of the solution, it should be combined with other measures to effectively address traffic congestion.

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site's author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task response
Make your position more direct in the intro. Say clearly how far you agree.
task response
Add one more strong and real example to support your main idea.
task response
Explain a little more why free transport may not fully solve traffic jams.
coherence and cohesion
Use linking words with more care so ideas flow in a more natural way.
coherence and cohesion
Some topic sentences are a bit general. Make them more focused on your main point.
coherence and cohesion
Try to connect the last line of one idea to the next idea more smoothly.
task response
You answer all parts of the question and give a clear opinion.
task response
Your main ideas are easy to understand and mostly well explained.
coherence and cohesion
The essay has a clear intro, body, and conclusion.
coherence and cohesion
Each paragraph has one main idea, so the essay is easy to follow.
Include an introduction and conclusion

A conclusion is essential for IELTS writing task 2. It is more important than most people realise. You will be penalised for missing a conclusion in your IELTS essay.

The easiest paragraph to write in an essay is the conclusion paragraph. This is because the paragraph mostly contains information that has already been presented in the essay – it is just the repetition of some information written in the introduction paragraph and supporting paragraphs.

The conclusion paragraph only has 3 sentences:

  • Summary
  • Restatement of thesis
  • Prediction or recommendation

Example:

To summarize, a robotic teacher does not have the necessary disciple to properly give instructions to students and actually works to retard the ability of a student to comprehend new lessons. Therefore, it is clear that the idea of running a classroom completely by a machine cannot be supported. After thorough analysis on this subject, it is predicted that the adverse effects of the debate over technology-driven teaching will always be greater than the positive effects, and because of this, classroom teachers will never be substituted for technology.

Start your conclusion with a linking phrase. Here are some examples:

  • In conclusion
  • To conclude
  • To summarize
  • Finally
  • In a nutshell
  • In general
What to do next:
Look at other essays: