News organisations should be allowed to publish information without government restrictions. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

5.5 / 9
✍️ Want to check your own essay?Write on this topic →
Introduction
In recent years, the
media
Use synonyms
has become a place for everyone to
gain
Use synonyms
information
Use synonyms
. Some
People
Use synonyms
believe that the
Media
Use synonyms
should be allowed to publish any
information
Use synonyms
,
while
Linking Words
others argue that the
government
Use synonyms
needs to regulate it.
Although
Linking Words
allowing
news
Use synonyms
organisations to publish
information
Use synonyms
freely offers several benefits, I believe that proper regulation offers more advantages,
such
Linking Words
as protecting
people
Use synonyms
’s personal privacy and controlling misinformation in society.
Body paragraph 1
On the one hand, restricting or even forbidding
information
Use synonyms
from being published to
people
Use synonyms
violates human rights.
Information
Use synonyms
that is
Linking Words
necessary for citizens,
for instance
Linking Words
, could not be received if the authorities restrict it from being published by the
media
Use synonyms
.
Consequently
Linking Words
,
people
Use synonyms
will only
gain
Use synonyms
information
Use synonyms
that has been decided by the
government
Use synonyms
.
Consequently
Linking Words
,
people
Use synonyms
will be unable to acquire
information
Use synonyms
from different resources that can be used to broaden their perspective based on different points of view.
Body paragraph 2
On the other hand
Linking Words
, regulations are necessary to prevent misinformation from spreading
wildly
Rephrase
widely
show examples
in society. Many
news
Use synonyms
organizations are
Change the spelling
organisations
show examples
spread misinformation to
gain
Use synonyms
more viewer or to increase their profit without concerning about the consequences.
For example
Linking Words
, many
people
Use synonyms
tend to easily believe what they want to believe, especially on social
media
Use synonyms
. Tax
news
Use synonyms
,
for instance
Linking Words
, if the
media
Use synonyms
says that it has a negative effect on the economy,
people
Use synonyms
will believe it and start to stop paying their taxes, causing turbulence in the national economy.
Furthermore
Linking Words
, it is
also
Linking Words
important to protect
people
Use synonyms
’s personal
information
Use synonyms
,
Add a semicolon
;
show examples
without regulations implemented by the
government
Use synonyms
, the
Media
Use synonyms
could exploit personal
information
Use synonyms
to
gain
Use synonyms
profit.
Conclusion
To
summarize
Change the spelling
summarise
show examples
, giving infinite freedom to
news
Use synonyms
organizations
Change the spelling
organisations
show examples
might give several benefits.
However
Linking Words
, with proper regulations implemented by the
government
Use synonyms
, I firmly believe that hoaxes will no longer be an issue
and
Punctuation problem
, and
show examples
people
Use synonyms
’s personal lives could be protected.

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site's author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task response
Make your view even more clear in the first paragraph. Say that you mostly disagree with full freedom for news groups because some rules are needed.
task response
Explain what “proper regulation” means. For example, rules can stop false news and stop the sharing of private facts, but they should not stop fair reports about those in power.
task response
Your tax example is not very likely. Most people would not stop paying tax only because of one news report. Use a more real example, such as false health news that makes people avoid a doctor or buy unsafe things.
task response
Do not say that false news will “no longer be an issue”. Rules can reduce false news, but they cannot end it fully. Use a more careful claim.
coherence and cohesion
Your essay has a clear four-part shape: start, one side, your main side, and end. Keep this shape.
coherence and cohesion
Avoid saying “Consequently” two times in a row. Join the two ideas, or use a different link such as “As a result” or “In this way”.
coherence and cohesion
Make the first main paragraph link more directly to the question. It is about the harm of too much control, while the question is about no government limits. Say this clearly at the start of the paragraph.
coherence and cohesion
Use clear topic lines for each body paragraph. For example: “Too much control can hide facts from the public.” Then explain and give one example.
task response
You answer both sides of the issue and clearly state your own view.
task response
You give two useful reasons for rules: stopping false news and keeping private facts safe.
coherence and cohesion
The ideas are in a clear order, and the end paragraph brings your main view back.
coherence and cohesion
You use linking words such as “On the one hand”, “On the other hand”, and “For example” to guide the reader.
What to do next:
Look at other essays: