Some people feel that it is always wrong to keep animals in captivity, for instance in zoos. Other people say that there are benefits for the animals and for humans. Discuss both sides of this debate, and give your personal view

6.5 / 9
✍️ Want to check your own essay?Write on this topic →
Introduction
Nowadays, keeping wild
animals
Use synonyms
in
captivity
Use synonyms
,
such
Linking Words
as in zoos, has become a common practice.
However
Linking Words
, people are divided on whether
this
Linking Words
is a positive approach or a harmful one. In my opinion,
while
Linking Words
captivity
Use synonyms
can help protect certain species, I believe that keeping wild
animals
Use synonyms
locked up does more harm than good.
Body paragraph 1
On the one hand, opponents argue that
captivity
Use synonyms
violates animal rights.
Animals
Use synonyms
naturally belong in the wild, where they can roam, hunt, and live freely. Confining them to small cages disrupts their natural instincts and often leads to severe stress or health problems.
For instance
Linking Words
, birds that are unable to fly freely or large
animals
Use synonyms
restricted to concrete enclosures suffer physically and mentally.
Therefore
Linking Words
, taking
animals
Use synonyms
out of their natural habitats for human entertainment is ethically wrong.
Body paragraph 2
On the other hand
Linking Words
, supporters claim that zoos and captive breeding programs play a vital role in wildlife conservation.
Due to
Linking Words
climate change, deforestation, and poaching, many endangered species face the risk of extinction. Keeping them in protected environments ensures their survival, providing them with regular food, medical care, and safety from predators.
Additionally
Linking Words
, zoos offer valuable educational experiences, helping people develop a deeper appreciation for nature.
Conclusion
In conclusion,
although
Linking Words
keeping
animals
Use synonyms
in
captivity
Use synonyms
provides safety and protection for endangered species, I firmly believe that the loss of freedom and the negative psychological impact outweigh these benefits. Governments should prioritise protecting natural habitats
instead
Linking Words
.

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site's author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task response
You answer both views and give a clear view of your own. To make the answer stronger, explain more why good zoos may help animals, not only keep them safe. For example, say how zoo workers can help animals have babies and later go back to the wild.
task response
Your main view is clear, but it could be more balanced. You say captivity does more harm than good, yet you also say it can protect some animals. Add one clear rule, such as: zoos should be used only when they help animals return to the wild.
task response
Your examples are clear and fit the topic. You could add one more real and clear example of an endangered animal, or explain what a protected place should look like. This would make your ideas feel more full.
coherence and cohesion
The essay has a clear order: start, one side, the other side, and end. Each paragraph has one main idea, so it is easy to follow.
coherence and cohesion
Use a few more links within paragraphs to show cause and result. For example: “As a result, they may become ill,” or “This is why some people support zoos.” Do not use too many links.
coherence and cohesion
The last paragraph clearly repeats your view. It could be even stronger if it briefly joined both sides: protected places can help in rare cases, but saving homes in the wild should come first.
task response
You deal with both sides of the question and state your own view clearly from the start.
task response
Your points stay on the topic. The ideas about stress, loss of freedom, safety, and learning are useful and easy to understand.
coherence and cohesion
Your paragraph plan is very clear, and the opening and ending work well.
coherence and cohesion
Words such as “On the one hand”, “On the other hand”, “Additionally”, and “In conclusion” help the reader follow your ideas.
Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • captivity
  • zoos
  • animal rights
  • conservation
  • rehabilitation
  • sanctuary
  • ethical considerations
  • natural habitat
  • psychological well-being
  • endangered species
  • educational programs
  • animal welfare
  • exploitation
  • human superiority
  • wildlife preservation
  • abnormal behaviors
What to do next:
Look at other essays: