It is argued that literature shouldn’t be teached at high school because students spend enormous time on reading of works of poetry, drama, fiction and non-fiction. Personally, I strongly disagree that literature should
Some people hold the belief that there is no sense for high school students to be learned literature for instance poems or novels. In my point of view, it mainly depends on the sphere about which a student is going to st
It is always a good idea to teach school students about Literature because learning literature helps students understand the history and origin of the information. By studying literature, students can be curious to know
Some Schools teach literature, especially to secondary level students. Many believe that this is unnecessary and more time should be utilised in studying academic subjects. I agree with this statement; however, I am not
There is currently a contentious argument over whether students should learn from classic reading in high school or not. I agree that nowadays this subject is not important anymore and in this essay, I will give some rea
Many today claim that learning about literature should no longer be a key component of the high school curriculum. In my opinion, there are practical reasons for this sentiment but literature still serves a purpose.
Undeniably, curricula for high school students includes literary study such as reading novels and poems because studying textbooks and reading literature not only booster students' basic skills like reading, speaking and
I contradict with the idea of comparing literature teaching as a time-wasting action. From my perspective, learning about poems and stories can bring more merits than demerits to young generations. The explanation for th
I contradict with the thought of studying literature as a time-wasting action. Learning about poems and stories can bring more merits than demerits to young generations. Literature can accompany young people in their sea