The discussion on hand is about past records of a criminal being available to the jury or not. I disagree with the current law of protecting the criminal.
Current British and Australian criminal laws, a jury has no authorization to obtain past criminal record of the defendant. Therefore, it is suggested that this method should be modified, and a jury should be provided wit
In the contemporary era, due to the burgeoning population, crime rate have spiked over the time. It becomes a threatening issue for the whole world today. As per the rules of The great britain and Austrailia, the Lawyers
The practice of keeping a board away from the background information of the defendant has been present in most of the western countries' law systems for many centuries. This is because, an accused man needs to be treated
The written documents of a country that give justice of a country is called law. A country contains both criminal and civil laws, and ensure the judicial system. Some countries give permission of accessing the criminal
IN SOME COUNTRIES, GOVERNMENT MADE A RULE THAT CRIMINAL HISTORY IS NO ACCESIBLE IN A COURT BY A JURY WHEN TAKING A DECISION FOR A CASE AND THIS SAVE THE PEOPLE. AS SOME ADVOCATES BELIEVE, I ALSO THINK THAT, THIS WAY OF T
Several countries in the British common wealth do not provide the jury access to a defendant’s past criminal record to ensure a fair trial. Some lawyers who oppose this perspective believe the jury should be provided a c
The Australian and British judiciary systems provide with almost zero information and details of any suspect’s past criminal background which often results in the person’s walking free of any charge. It is being argued t
In England and Australia, a jury is not allowed to have ay information about the offende’s past. Some lawers suggest that having the past criminal record will help the judge make a judgement more accurately. From my poin
Making the right decision is the mission of the judges so that it puts a huge pressure on them. The question whether to show the jury the previous criminal actions of the defendant has raised a conflict between law-maker
Making the right decision is the mission of the judges so that it puts a huge pressure on them. The question whether to show the jury the previous criminal actions of the defendant has raised a conflict between lawmakers
A decision is very crucial act when it comes to judiciary and criminal activities. A decision statement is fate deciding factor for the accused and also for the victim. Judgement is always been a debatable subject becaus
Finalizing a verdict to a culprit is absolutely challenging when a judge has limited information. A stellar example of such is the British and Australian laws whose jury have no access to the previous criminal record of
The Australian and British judiciary systems provide with almost zero information and details of any suspect’s past criminal background which often results in the person’s walking free of any charge. Also, it is being ar
There has been a long debate about the allocation of health budget on treatment and prevention. Some people argue that large proportion of budget should be spent on treatment whereas some oppose this view point. I believ
In some parts of the world, namely the USA, Britain and Australia, a person who is accused of a crime is judged in front of a jury of his peers. Unlike the American system in which, the defendant's criminal record is bro
It is believed, and rightly so, that a person learns from his past and makes his future bright by correcting the mistakes committed in the past. Due to this, a person should not be judged, as a whole, by his past deeds o
The laws of Britain and Australia state that the jury involved in a criminal case is given no access to background information about the defendant’s past criminal record. This as a matter of fact protects the person accu
In England and Australia, juries are not granted access to personal criminal records in order to protect the accused’s policy. However, some lawyers believe that having certain information about defendants could allow th
The authorities of developed countries, have enacted laws that prevents people who have been sworn to give an impartial verdict, from visualizing past criminal information of the accused. It has been opined by attorneys