Some people believe government should spend money on building train and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion. Others think that building more and wider roads is the better way to reduce traffic congestion. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Traffic jam is a serious problem in many countries in the world. Certain individuals ascertain that government should invest their budget in public transportation. However, others argue that a better way to reduce traffic congestion is road expansion. In my opinion, I believe that building more trains and subway lines i s a better option. On the one hand, widening or constructing new streets have two main benefits. Firstly, due to the a increase of car users, there is not enough space for private automotive vehicles. This leads to an overload of existing roads, thus the government should allocate their budget to upgrade and constructing new roads. Secondly, more and more people who live outside the cities commute to work by their private vehicles. If the road system was bigger and had more lanes, individuals would be able to pass through faster. Therefore, building more highways is significantly vital to reduce peak-hour traffic congestion. On the other hand, there are two reasons why the government should invest in public transportation infrastructure. One reason is that trains can carry a large number of people at the same time. As a result, the more people using public transit, the less private cars being used. This would lead to fewer traffic jams in rush hours. Another factor to consider is that, in most cities, expanding the road is not practical because there is not enough land. Therefore, building metro networks that work underground can be a wise decision. Residents can commute to work faster and safer so traffic jams can be reduced drastically. As far as I am concerned, the government should spend their budget on public transportation and encourage more people to use train and subway lines. In conclusion, the government can tackle traffic congestion by widening the roads, but in the long-term, building more transit systems would be a better choice.
Submitted by The expense of living is higher in developed nations and it affects directly to citizens and society. In this essay, I will express this issue and some resolves. People living in the US or any European country would face daily expensive cost and it affects directly to every citizen and society. Firstly, It forces adult individuals to work in most of the time and takes away enjoyable moments in their lives. For instance, a direct salesman in car dealers usually conducts their tasks from 6 am to 8 pm to maximum volume of sales and meet daily costs. Secondly, this fact creates a bunch of homeless people, who come from both white-collar and blue-collar workers. In Silicon Valley, teachers, bankers or staffs of governments live in track, which is normal images that local people see every day. The best way is that governments and corporation must act together. In the US, authorities in some province encourage real estate companies to build more houses and apartments, they act to remove and shrink terms, conditions in certain sectors. Some also decrease business tax massively to attract large conglomerate. It results in thousands of apartments, house, which appear at the edge of cities or state. Let’s take Google corporation is an example, they proactively associated with state government and sponsor to provide low-cost houses in Silicon Valley for their employees and valley citizens. High cost in developed countries and other issues always happens in different contexts, hence individuals, corporation, and authorities must act and take their responsibility in life and our society. on
What to do next:
Try other services:

All the services are free for Premium users