Some countries today have passed laws against smoking tobacco in public buildings such as offices and restaurants. Other countries have no intention of doing this. Consider the possible arguments on both sides of this debate, and reach your own conclusion on which side you favour.

Due to the health effects of smoking, some states consider banning smoking in public constructions,
such
as, hospitals, offices and restaurants. Albeit, the negative impacts of smoking, other countries do not take an action against
this
issue. We will consider both sides of the debate in
this
essay. On the one hand, the opponents of the legislation of prohibiting smoking cigarettes in public buildings promote the idea that
this
may lead to affect the national economy, especially in tobacco-producing countries.
This
happens when the profit taxes from commercial farming and industrial tobacco fall down.
Moreover
, a less awareness of detrimental effects of smoking in some countries.
For example
, in some developing
nations there
Accept comma addition
nations, there
is
lack
Suggestion
a lack
of advertising and awareness campaigns and
this
phenomena and its drawbacks on the society's members. By
this
may rise the ignorance about the necessity of laws against smoking.
By contrast
, proponents of laws that prevent smokers to smoke in places which is crowded with people are able to cite that
this
results in keep these locations healthy. An evidence could be shown by a research has been conducted by the National Health Centre about the diseases that the smokers and passive smokers may suffer from. So prohibition smoking leads to undermining the possibility of lung and heart cancer from attacking people.
For instance
, about
of
Suggestion
about
75% of lung cancer patients are smokers and 25% of the them are
second
smokers. Overall, I would tend to side with proponents of legislation of smoking prohibition in public areas. It seems to be a considerable method to keep the air fresh and vacant of poisonous particles that
come
Suggestion
comes
from come from smoking which is essential to non-smokers and smokers.
Submitted by khaldoun198 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Include an introduction and conclusion

A conclusion is essential for IELTS writing task 2. It is more important than most people realise. You will be penalised for missing a conclusion in your IELTS essay.

The easiest paragraph to write in an essay is the conclusion paragraph. This is because the paragraph mostly contains information that has already been presented in the essay – it is just the repetition of some information written in the introduction paragraph and supporting paragraphs.

The conclusion paragraph only has 3 sentences:

  • Summary
  • Restatement of thesis
  • Prediction or recommendation

Example:

To summarize, a robotic teacher does not have the necessary disciple to properly give instructions to students and actually works to retard the ability of a student to comprehend new lessons. Therefore, it is clear that the idea of running a classroom completely by a machine cannot be supported. After thorough analysis on this subject, it is predicted that the adverse effects of the debate over technology-driven teaching will always be greater than the positive effects, and because of this, classroom teachers will never be substituted for technology.

Start your conclusion with a linking phrase. Here are some examples:

  • In conclusion
  • To conclude
  • To summarize
  • Finally
  • In a nutshell
  • In general

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: