Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end hunger and poverty, while others say that economic growth is damaging the environment so it must be stopped. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Economic development has been capturing a great deal of public attention in recent decades due to its ramifications on both humans’ living standards and environment. Despite its benefits of addressing poverty and hunger, economic

growth

could be fraught with more environmental drawbacks. On the one hand, it is true that a better economy could put an end to poverty and hunger. Frist, the developed economy means higher disbursements on

agricultural sector

Suggestion

the agricultural sector

agricultural sectors

.

This

would feed into reliable crop-

yeilds

be the cause or source of

yields

and increased productivity, saving many lives from the cycle of food shortages.

Second

, economic

growth

correlates with the rise in employment opportunities for

citizens especially

Accept comma addition

citizens, especially

low

Suggestion

lower

-class ones stemming from the

installments

a payment of part of a debt; usually paid at regular intervals

instalments

instruments

instalments'

of industrial parks and outsourcing activities.

Consequently

,

this

would ensure stable payments, thereby helping individuals escape from chronic poverty.

On the other hand

,

economy

Suggestion

the economy

would develop at the expenses of environmental destruction.

First

,

this

pattern could come at the costs of the mushrooming of manufacturing factories and delivery vehicles, emitting noxious fumes. It is proved that the higher concentrations of carbon dioxide and CFCs in the

atmospphere

a particular environment or surrounding influence

atmosphere

must be inevitable, making citizens more susceptible to

irreversable

incapable of being reversed

irreversible

diseases including tuberculosis or lung cancer.

In addition

, the economic

growth

correlates with the

overconsumption

of resources for energy or trading.

This

acts as an incentive for the

overexploitation

of national elements, shaking the environmental equilibrium and decelerating the rehabilitation. In conclusion, humans could not prioritize economic

growth

over environmental balance.

This

would result in the consequence of

environmenal

of or relating to the external conditions or surroundings

environmental

deterioration

,

Accept space

,

which directly affects human health adversely in the long term.