The funds for postgraduate research are limited; therefore some people think that the government should provide financial support. In their opinion, only scientific research should be funded, rather than other less useful subjects. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Owing to the limited availability of state funds. It is being argued that governments should only help financially to those students who are in scientific programs. I dissent the release of education funds to science courses only rather I believe government must try to sport every postgraduate course Admittedly, it is imperative to fund the scientific programs of postgraduate. As these study areas can enrich the current scientific knowledge of postgraduate, it makes them highly inventive in term of a technology to carry out new inventions.
For example
, only scientific and knowledge has made it possible to explore other distinct planets like Mars in recent years.
Similarly
, an advanced medical study has profound impact on human life in the term of health which can be seen from the improvement in life expectancy, so expecting to finance it is not a meaningless Idea
However
, the state should always subsidise other non-scientific postgraduate degrees
such
as economics and literature.
For instance
, the former study courses produce futuristic political economists who can better analysis of the finances of a country. Eventually, they may help in making new politicians to prevent upcoming economical cripples and making a country economically stronger.
Likewise
, literature and culture courses cannot be neglected for giving monetary help. Because it not only spreads the sense of brotherhood, but
also
keeps people attached to their roots, which results in the secured social fabric of Civilization In conclusion, while due to the inadequate educational budget, I accept that money should be allocated to the scientific research, I
also
believe that educational funding would not go to waste where it invested in the other research courses in tertiary education.
Submitted by hunjanarun776 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Include an introduction and conclusion

A conclusion is essential for IELTS writing task 2. It is more important than most people realise. You will be penalised for missing a conclusion in your IELTS essay.

The easiest paragraph to write in an essay is the conclusion paragraph. This is because the paragraph mostly contains information that has already been presented in the essay – it is just the repetition of some information written in the introduction paragraph and supporting paragraphs.

The conclusion paragraph only has 3 sentences:

  • Summary
  • Restatement of thesis
  • Prediction or recommendation

Example:

To summarize, a robotic teacher does not have the necessary disciple to properly give instructions to students and actually works to retard the ability of a student to comprehend new lessons. Therefore, it is clear that the idea of running a classroom completely by a machine cannot be supported. After thorough analysis on this subject, it is predicted that the adverse effects of the debate over technology-driven teaching will always be greater than the positive effects, and because of this, classroom teachers will never be substituted for technology.

Start your conclusion with a linking phrase. Here are some examples:

  • In conclusion
  • To conclude
  • To summarize
  • Finally
  • In a nutshell
  • In general

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: