Food travels thousands of miles from producers to consumers. Some people think that it would be better for the environment and economy if people ate only the local food produced by farmers. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Nowadays,
food industry
Suggestion
the food industry
has become so globalized that various products go on a long journey before reaching the end users.
However
, the financial and environmental impacts of
food
import/export
has always been
Suggestion
have always been
had always been
a matter of controversy. I believe to a
larger
above average in size or number or quantity or magnitude or extent
large
extent that if the soil of a region has the potential of producing high-quality products, that would be beneficial to inhibit massive
food
transports. Transferring
food
across the countries is likely to pose irreversible damages to the environment. The higher the rate of
food
import, the more oil and gas is burnt.
Consequently
, more pollutants are emitted, jeopardizing the state of the Ozone layer.
In addition
, many local farmers often give up agriculture and tend to pursue other occupations as the consumers' demands are met by non-local commodities.
Hence
, the dearth of job opportunities becomes one of the critical issues that requires serious measurements to be encountered.
However
,
food
transfer is inevitable in some cases. Some lands are exposed to the risk of drought
as a result
of
decreased rate
Suggestion
decreased rates
a decreased rate
of precipitation as well as soil erosion. In
such
places, the necessity of
food
import for preventing famine is indisputable. On top of
this
challenge, in some densely populated regions, the local farmers are not capable of meeting the consumers' needs. Overall, in order to mitigate the implications of
food
transfer to nature and economy, imposing some supervisions seems to be vital. By rational distribution of the
food
around the world, the repercussions are more probable to turn into profits for areas dealing with
food
shortages.
Submitted by sahar.rezapour94 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • environmentally friendly
  • carbon emissions
  • long-distance transportation
  • biodiversity
  • pesticides
  • fertilizers
  • local economy
  • sustainability
  • feasible
  • diverse range
  • food choices
  • cultural identity
What to do next:
Look at other essays: