Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by a very small number of people. People say that govt should spend public money on saving these languages. Discuss both views and give ur opinion.

It is true that many languages are on the verge of dying, as n

umber

Suggestion

the number

of people speaking these are very small. Some people argue that

government

officials should take necessary steps to save these languages, by funding from public wealth. I partially agree with these people, as e

normous utilization

Suggestion

the enormous utilization

an enormous utilization

of tax payer's money to save these languages spoken by minorities, shall be recognized a waste of resources. On the one hand, every language should be protected from extinction, as they represent the cultural as well as h

istorical evolution

Suggestion

the historical evolution

of a society. Though, the amount of people using these tongues a

re

Suggestion

is

very minimal, the relevance of these speeches could be exorbitantly important, especially considering the contributions they have made in building up the society.

Thus

,

government

has to give predominant consideration in reestablishment of these linguistic heritages. If a language g

o

Suggestion

goes

extinct, the changes are irreversible. So, authorities should come up with necessary steps to rejuvenate the reputation of these languages among public and attract more and more people towards it.

On the other hand

, reserving h

uge amount

Suggestion

a huge amount

huge amounts

the huge amount

of tax payer's salary for non developmental purposes can be a threat to any society in l

ong run.

Suggestion

the long run

There can be a variety of spoken languages in a country or place. Investing incessantly to save the literatures followed by minorities, could put any

government

in debt. Official funds are encouraged to be used for the advantage of its citizens.

For instance

, C

hineese

a native or inhabitant of Communist China or of Nationalist China

Chinese

officials had invested a massive amount of money to save an ancient form of c

hineese

a native or inhabitant of Communist China or of Nationalist China

Chinese

calligraphy, which was rarely used. The programme was a complete failure, as it did not get acceptance from the public. Authorities had to call it off. The

government

faced h

eavy loss

Suggestion

heavy losses

of f

und,

Suggestion

funding

despite of all the efforts. To conclude, actions to protect dying languages have to be taken by the

government

by backing financially,

h

owever in

Accept comma addition

however, in

my perspective, over funding for

this

cause, is non productive and may put the

government

in financial distress in l

ong run.

Suggestion

the long run