Young people are often influenced by others in the same age in their behaviour and situations. This is called "peer group pressure". Do the disadvantages outweigh the advantages?

On the negative sides, always people know new people and should communicate with them for vital things

such

Linking Words

as work and education.

In particular

Linking Words

, the young people are more enthusiastic than other people for knowing new people.

However

Linking Words

, they cannot learn positive things from each person. They can have malicious habits like smoking or drinking,

as a result

Linking Words

of which immature people might do them.

In addition

Linking Words

, there are some people who tell a lie and persuades young people to detrimental addictions.

For instance

Linking Words

, particularly aged about 15- 20 people are deceived easily by malign people. In some countries in the world the level of young people who smokes and commits a crime is considerably high. I think that the main reason is that people who are approximately the same age with them have a harmful effect on these people.

Despite the evident drawbacks, I still believe that peer group pressure has more benefits for developing young people. The major advantage of

this

Linking Words

is that there are a large number of people who cannot describe their behaviour or opinion;

therefore

Linking Words

, the effects of other people are crucial for these people.

Moreover

Linking Words

, sometimes the youths might not obtain achievement in any work,

as a result

Linking Words

of which they do not interest

this

Linking Words

work.

For example

Linking Words

, when Michael Phelps was young he could not acquire any achievement.

As a result

Linking Words

, he wanted to leave swimming;

however

Linking Words

, three years later he returned swimming with many friends, so he and his friends are 8-time Olympic champion.