Some people think that only staff who worked in a company for a long time should be promoted to a higher position. What's your opinion?

A society of people believes that promotions should be given to employees who worked in a
company
for a long time. Whereas the other proportion of people tends to differ from
this
approach. In my opinion, I agree with the latter school of thought. The principal rationale behind the latter point of view is that workers who switch companies will have wide exposure about the industry and I agree with the same.
In other words
, in order to move from one
company
to another, that candidate should have good technical knowledge to crack an interview, which makes them sagacious than those who remain in the same
company
for a longer period.
For instance
, recent research conducted by the World Employee Council demonstrated that eighty percent of workers who stay in an organization for shorter time are most efficient that the others. Because of the efficiency they have the ability to escalate the efficiency at work, which enables that
company
to generate higher revenue.
Consequently
,
this
paves the way for that
company
to reach the pinnacle.
Secondly
, frequent
job
changes are smart workers. Owing to the capability of being smarter than hard workers, their career growth will be increasing drastically, as they have the potential to get a
job
done easier and they think out of the box.
For example
, a survey conducted by the government of the UK illustrated that
job
changers are smarter when compared to the rest. Due to which they get a better increment,
thus
by converting all their breakdowns into breakthroughs.
As a result
, smart working employees not only grow in the career, but
also
make the organization develop. In conclusion, I strongly believe that staff who changes
job
is much more capable than those who are stagnating in the same
company
, which proves that
job
changers should be promoted to a higher position.

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Include an introduction and conclusion

A conclusion is essential for IELTS writing task 2. It is more important than most people realise. You will be penalised for missing a conclusion in your IELTS essay.

The easiest paragraph to write in an essay is the conclusion paragraph. This is because the paragraph mostly contains information that has already been presented in the essay – it is just the repetition of some information written in the introduction paragraph and supporting paragraphs.

The conclusion paragraph only has 3 sentences:

  • Summary
  • Restatement of thesis
  • Prediction or recommendation

Example:

To summarize, a robotic teacher does not have the necessary disciple to properly give instructions to students and actually works to retard the ability of a student to comprehend new lessons. Therefore, it is clear that the idea of running a classroom completely by a machine cannot be supported. After thorough analysis on this subject, it is predicted that the adverse effects of the debate over technology-driven teaching will always be greater than the positive effects, and because of this, classroom teachers will never be substituted for technology.

Start your conclusion with a linking phrase. Here are some examples:

  • In conclusion
  • To conclude
  • To summarize
  • Finally
  • In a nutshell
  • In general

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: