During last twenty years, the assessment of students has undergone a major transformation. Many educational institutions have shifted their focus from traditional examination towards variety of innovative assessment techniques, as they believe traditional examination results are not often true to student's ability. To what extent do you agree with this?

Evaluating students
has witnessed
have witnessed
a strong change over the past years where many educational centres are replacing the old extensive method of checking with a modern approach as they feel the traditional way is flawed and often misguided. I, to a greater extent, agree with
transformation. There are myriad of reasons why I support contemporary methods of examining.
, unconventional forms of evaluation
as presentation, sudden quiz, group assignment, open book exam
appraise student’s ability in a more precise and accurate way. When a student gives a presentation in front of other fellow mates and teachers, it not only represents their creativity and presentation
skills but
Accept comma addition
skills, but
helps them become confident which aids them later in their career prospects.
, it is evident why these new techniques are fitting in perfectly in
modern time. Reinforcing
, these days, colleges are conducting sudden tests that keep the learners updated with the class lecture where the focus of assessment is
the attentiveness
and understanding of the students towards the subject matter.
, the open book exam is a good technique to judge a student’s understanding of the concepts.
, these approaches scrutinize a learner’s creativity, depth of knowledge and reasoning ability to use them in the real world.
, some consider
new criterion to be idiosyncratic as students can copy paste their works from others and achieve good grades. Probably due to
, universities and many language test authorities still adhere to the traditional assessment approach in which students have to express their understanding in a paper-based exam. From the aforementioned points, it can be concluded that, the educational institutions should not adhere to the old dogma and invite innovation in teaching methods or assessing students.

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Read more in the eBook

The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »

* free ebook for Premium users

What to do next:
Look at other essays: