In a number of countries, some people think it's necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

The way people choose to transfer between cities is the
the central or most important feature
of every society, with different views on whether we need to invest in creating modern machines or an improvement in current methods will be enough. Using high-speed trains to travel between cities would decrease commuting
from one city to another.
modern facilities benefit from state-of the art technology resulted from a massive investment, enabling them to reach speeds of, say, 300 km/h.
means that the
a person who changes location
would spend less
on the road.
, energy consumption will be likely to decrease. In order to avoid the derailment of very fast trains, their railways are usually manufactured in a straighter path than those for normal-speed trains, meaning that they no longer need to take turns every so often, which results in fewer brakes and more efficient use of fuel. Some may argue that if a tremendous amount of money is invested in incumbent public
, less
would be required to accomplish the project since there is no need to lay the foundation from the very beginning and only slight changes would be enough. People can
enjoy using less expensive
systems like buses and normal-speed trains because their tickets are usually cheaper compared to high-tech
, it should be noted that in most cases a simple amendment in roads or
facilities would be much more
-consuming than altering the whole system since it usually requires major improvement in, say, bus platform or train design. Meanwhile, fast
tickets are not necessarily more expensive since their desired profit could be earned by transferring more people at any one
rather than higher ticket price. In conclusion, I believe that by investing a huge amount of money in developing high-speed trains between
cities people
Accept comma addition
cities, people
no longer need to spend so many hours on
the roads
and there would be huge optimization in energy consumption.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Read more in the eBook

The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »

* free ebook for Premium users

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

What to do next:
Try other services:

All the services are free for Premium users