Increasing the price of fuel is the best way to solve the growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think might be effective?

Traffic
and
pollution
have become issues that are on the
increase
and the best method of resolving these is by raising the fee at which fuel is sold. In my opinion, I disagree with
this
solution because
instead
of solving the issues at hand, it would result to
increase
in prices of goods and services. These problems can be resolved effectively by establishing
traffic
congestion and environmental laws and conducting vehicle checks on a planned frequency. Hiking the price of petrol is not a solution for the increasing
traffic
jams and environmental
pollution
because it will lead to a rise in prices of goods and services.
This
method of resolving the issue with
road
traffic
and
pollution
is not feasible because it will inevitably bring about hardship if the lower class are not able to afford to buy food items for consumption.
This
will leave the
country
in a state of hardship
thus
, causing more harm to citizens.
For example
, in 1998 when there was an
increase
in the fee paid for purchasing gasoline in Nigeria, it resulted to
increase
in prices of goods and services.
This
action left the
country
in great distress because low income earners were not able to afford the foods at expensive rates, which led to severe hunger and poverty in most parts of the
country
.
Thus
, inflating the price of fuel as the solution for
traffic
and
pollution
problem is not effective. The two main effective methods for solving these issues are by creating
road
traffic
and environmental laws and conducting regular checks on cars.
Firstly
, laws guiding
road
traffic
and
pollution
should be established as it will aid in calling individuals to order. These rules should be enforced as well by creating a group of people that will ensure that
road
users abide by the laws. If they fail to follow these set rules,
then
a taxing system should be introduced where people pay fines if they break these laws especially, knowingly. A survey conducted by the Federal
Road
Safety Commission, in
Road Safety Commission
Suggestion
the Road Safety Commission
, in Nigeria concluded that when fines were introduced as a punishment for breaking gridlock rules, the citizens began to pay more attention to the laws and made conscious efforts to abide by them.
Secondly
, vehicle checks should be done on vehicles plying the roads to ascertain if there are worthy to be driven on the roads or not. Most times, air
pollution
is caused by fumes from cars that are inappropriately managed.
Thus
,
this
measure will help to minimise the number of vehicles that are not properly maintained and could cause air
pollution
. To illustrate
this
, the introduction of
road
worthiness in Nigeria, has greatly assisted the Nigerian Vehicle Inspection Organisation to ascertain vehicles that are not fit to be on the roads
thus
, enforcing that
such
cars should be repaired before its being driven again.
In other words
,
this
means has reduced
pollution
caused by gas fumes from poorly maintained vehicles on the roads. In conclusion, I disagree with the suggestion that hiking prices of gasoline will eradicate
traffic
and
pollution
issues because
this
will result
to
Suggestion
in
a rise in the prices at which goods and services are made available to people. In my opinion, effective methods of solving these issues are by introducing congestion
in
Suggestion
on
the highways and environmental laws as well as regular vehicle checks by authorised bodies in the
country
. Yours sincerely, Bill
Submitted by amala.kambili on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: