In many cities the use of video cameras in public places is being increased in order to reduce crime, but some people believe that these measures restrict our individual freedom. Do the benefits of increased security outweigh the drawbacks?

It is true that the use of CCTV is becoming widespread. In

this

regard, it is sometimes argued that an increasing number of cameras in public places could violate the privacy of people.

However I

Accept comma addition

However, I

do believe that the advantages could outweigh the possible drawbacks. Being watched or even being controlled continuously amid an immense number of surveillance cameras could deprive the sense of freedom from people. People always would feel that someone is spying on him and watching his behaviour in public areas.

Moreover

, covering the large area by the cameras would be considered a threat to security of community. Hacker probably could control the servers of public CCTVs and they could steal the data and recorded video.

For example

, They might use Artificial Intelligent technologies like image processing to track or identify their targets by misusing these resources.

However

, CCTV could be extremely positive for the security of society. Police could use the recorded videos from crime locations to identify easily the criminals. In

this

way, public cameras play an important role to protect us and deter committing crimes.

In addition

, the frequent patrolling of police becomes decreased in favour of installing CCTV throughout the city.

As a result

, the cost of police operation would decline significantly. In Conclusion, I can understand why people worried about surveillance cameras that may confine their freedom, but it seems to me that the benefits of cameras do outweigh their potential negative prospects.