Some people believe government should spend money on building train and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion. Others think that building more and wider roads is the better way to reduce traffic congestion. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Methods to address
traffic
jams is a contentious topic for many people. While some people think that government funds should be poured in constructing more railways and
subway
lines, I believe that widening streets would reduce the vehicle density. The debate over
this
topic seems to consist of two irreconcilable poles. My essay will discuss these opposite camps before my opinion is given. It is true that government should invest money in a road extension in order to alleviate the volume of
traffic
. The reason here is that citizens would have more spacious roads to commute every day between workplace and home with the absence of congested lanes.
Therefore
, the prospect of bumper-to-bumper
traffic
may be immediately tackled thanks to
this
investment.
However
, I believe that the extension and construction of roads would bring about certain problems. Widening the streets would directly lead to the deficit of the national budget, not only for infrastructure construction, but
also
for the charge of household migration to other areas.
This
even evokes people to use private transport which is the culprit of clogged
traffic
flows. It is within the realm of possibility that building trains and
subway
lines may accelerate more people to commute by public vehicles. By
this
way, the number of private vehicles is likely to be reduced and
traffic
would flow smoothly.
For example
, Japan saw a significant decrease in the density of vehicles after building underground tunnels and it has happened for years.
Therefore
,
this
essay believes that constructing more railways and
subway
lines are more beneficial for the national budget. In conclusion, people have different views about avoiding severe
traffic
congestion problems.
Although
some people think that road extensions is a good solution, I believe that building train and
subway
lines are more feasible because
this
measure would minimize the number of people commuting by their own vehicles.

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: