In many countries, tourism is a major part of the economy, but it also causes environmental damage and ruins the places it exploits. It is argued that tourists should pay an additional tax to compensate for this damage. Do you agree?

In the past two

decades there

Accept comma addition

decades, there

has been an influx in the number of people who are able to travel to places of interest and beauty. One of the consequences of

this

has been that the locations these tourists visit

have been spoiled

Suggestion

has been spoiled

and even destroyed. I am of the opinion that tourists should pay a charge to repair the damage they bring

about but

Accept comma addition

about, but

feel that those responsible for looking after tourist attractions should

also

play their part in caring for them. I support the practice of requiring visitors to help those who are responsible for maintaining tourist attractions with a monetary payment. When a town,

city

or place of beauty receives thousands of visitors every year the cost of,

for instance

, cleaning, disposal of rubbish, an increased number of staff and provision of services can be high, which places a strain on budgets.

This

is largely because the income

that is

at the disposal of, say, a town’s management is limited to what is made available from the taxes citizens pay. Venice charges all tourists an entrance fee to the

city

, which mitigates to some extent the impact of its millions of visitors annually, but has so far failed to fully protect

this

city

from those who come to enjoy it.

This

is a good example of why other strategies need to be adopted. More can be done than just collecting fees from visitors. For any tourist destination to continue to be viable, not only for visitors, but

also

for those who live there or nearby, there must be a clear policy set and funded by central government in consultation with town or

city

councils as to how

this

rapidly increasing influx of visitors is going to be managed. In Germany,

for instance

, Berlin had the backing of the national government to control the letting of apartments through Airbnb so that owners of property in the

city

were only permitted to let out

singLe

being or characteristic of a single thing or person

single

singles

shingle

apartments within their homes rather than their whole house.

This

had two positive effects: the price of accommodation for Berliners was kept at an affordable level and visitors to the

city

had the experience of living with a local. In conclusion, the growing numbers of tourists travelling the world is

producing

Suggestion

produced

problems

Suggestion

Problems

to which there are no easy answers. One welcome strategy has been to

charge

Suggestion

Charge

tourists a visitor fee, but I believe closer cooperation between central

government

Suggestion

Government

and those who are responsible for managing matters on the ground

would

Suggestion

Would

prove productive.