Air traffic is increasingly leading to more noise, pollution and airport construction. One reason for this is the growth in low-cost passsenegr flights, ofte to holiday destinations. some people say that the governmanet should try to reduce the air traffic by taxing it more heavily. Do you agree or disagree?

✨ Do you want to improve your IELTS writing?
The growing prevalence of
air
Use synonyms
travelling is contributing to environmental
pollution
Use synonyms
worldwide
besides
Linking Words
the construction of new airports. Low
air
Use synonyms
fares to the tourist areas is thought to be amongst the leading causes of
this
Linking Words
phenomenon that has led many to urge for heavy levies on
such
Linking Words
travelling. In my opinion,
this
Linking Words
suggestion is flawed and I believe that there are other ways that can be more promising to reduce atmospheric
pollution
Use synonyms
. Tourism and other holiday attractions are few of those joys that are already getting scanty because of the time pressures. Since people seldom get a vacation these days, above that planning a holiday trip in these vacations is even uncommon. Asking government to apply heavy taxation on
air
Use synonyms
fares will
further
Linking Words
prevent people from travelling.
This
Linking Words
will not only result in the dooming tourism-based economies, but will
also
Linking Words
leave people with little entertainment facilities.
Moreover
Linking Words
,
although
Linking Words
this
Linking Words
taxation may have some impact in reducing the
air
Use synonyms
and noise
pollution
Use synonyms
, it seems limited and there are far more effective ways of controlling the
air
Use synonyms
pollution
Use synonyms
. Switching over the vehicles that use fossil fuels to the newer electric cars that have zero emission of harmful gases as well as noise
pollution
Use synonyms
would probably be a better solution than limiting the
air
Use synonyms
travelling.
In other words
Linking Words
, the collective
pollution
Use synonyms
caused by vehicles on the roads is much more in comparison to that of planes,
thus
Linking Words
banning those vehicles which are run on fossil fuels would be much more effective.
For example
Linking Words
, Pakistan's average requirement for G10 fuel used in planes is about one-tenth of that of gasoline being used in cars and other transport.
Hence
Linking Words
it bolsters the view that cutting fossil fuel consuming cars is more effective than abolishing
air
Use synonyms
travel. To conclude, hiking
air
Use synonyms
fares due to heavy taxation will abandon people from travelling
besides
Linking Words
adding little towards the atmospheric protection.
Hence
Linking Words
it is suggested that measures like introducing electronic cars and preventing deforestation are more fruitful in combating
air
Use synonyms
pollution
Use synonyms
.
Submitted by aadidoc508 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: